- From: Enrico Franconi <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 23:28:26 +0100
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 19 Jan 2006, at 23:20, Pat Hayes wrote: >> In my text, I am proposing to have an informative statement saying >> that a safe way to have a working SPARQL with OWL-DL entailment is >> to restrict the scoping set B to include only URIs, and to have >> the above syntactic restrictions to the SPARQL BGPs. > > Good idea, provided only that we don't use the official label "OWL- > DL" for this case which I think would be misleading. How about just > calling it "simple OWL" or maybe "basic OWL" or some such > qualification (?) Fair enough. --e.
Received on Thursday, 19 January 2006 22:28:42 UTC