- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:59:15 -0500
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Jan 12, 2006, at 6:21 PM, Dan Connolly wrote: > This seems like a reasonably coherent argument for a new requirement, > complete with rationale and use case. > > If you support this requirement and would like to see us add it > to the critical path, please say so. I wanted subqueries in SPARQL since the beginning. However, I fear that if we took this requirement on right now, SPARQL would die. So I'm for this being a major priority in SPARQL version 2, if there's going to be such a thing. > If not, please help me come up with justification that might > satisfy the commentor. The best one I can think of: doing it *now* may kill the whole thing dead. Cheers, Kendall Clark
Received on Thursday, 12 January 2006 23:59:23 UTC