public-rdf-dawg@w3.org from January to March 2006 by date

Friday, 31 March 2006

• Re: re-opening the DESCRIBE issue Eric Prud'hommeaux
• minutes from 28 March Kendall Clark

Thursday, 30 March 2006

• Re: Review of JSON results format document Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: automatic extraction of rq23 examples Dan Connolly
• Re: Review of JSON results format document Kendall Clark
• Re: re-opening the DESCRIBE issue Dan Connolly
• Re: re-opening the DESCRIBE issue Seaborne, Andy
• Re: test suite maintenance: Syntax vs. Query tests Seaborne, Andy
• Review of JSON results format document Seaborne, Andy
• Re: re-opening the DESCRIBE issue Steve Harris
• Re: re-opening the DESCRIBE issue Pat Hayes

Wednesday, 29 March 2006

• Re: re-opening the DESCRIBE issue Kendall Clark
• re-opening the DESCRIBE issue Dan Connolly
• Re: paper on RDF querying relevant to DAWG (and to current discussions) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: 1.115 of sparql protocol editor's draft (WSDL2 cite) Kendall Clark
• Re: 1.115 of sparql protocol editor's draft (WSDL2 cite) Dan Connolly
• Re: paper on RDF querying relevant to DAWG (and to current discussions) Sergio Tessaris
• [CLOSED] (I guess) Re: [OK?] paper on RDF querying relevant to DAWG (and to current discussions) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• test suite maintenance: Syntax vs. Query tests Jeen Broekstra
• apologies for no-show @ yesterday's telcon Jeen Broekstra
• RE: [Fwd: rif-ucr published] "Rule Interchange Format Use Cases and Requirements" Sven Groppe
• [OK?] paper on RDF querying relevant to DAWG (and to current discussions) Sergio Tessaris

Tuesday, 28 March 2006

• Re: [Fwd: rif-ucr published] "Rule Interchange Format Use Cases and Requirements" Dan Connolly
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 28 Mar: in progress Libby Miller
• Re: nameValueForms: ok to postpone? Seaborne, Andy
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 28 Mar Enrico Franconi

Monday, 27 March 2006

• Re: SPARQL+JSON Dan Connolly
• Re: 1.115 of sparql protocol editor's draft (WSDL2 cite) Dan Connolly
• Re: 1.115 of sparql protocol editor's draft (WSDL2 cite) Kendall Clark
• agenda: RDF Data Access 28 Mar Dan Connolly
• Re: nameValueForms: ok to postpone? Kendall Clark
• Re: Meeting minutes: March 21st, 2006 Dan Connolly
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 28 Mar: in progress Steve Harris
• Re: 1.115 of sparql protocol editor's draft (WSDL2 cite) Dan Connolly
• nameValueForms: ok to postpone? Dan Connolly
• agenda: RDF Data Access 28 Mar: in progress Dan Connolly
• Re: Lost in the shuffle? (Re: PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR) Seaborne, Andy
• Re: ORDER BY allows expression, SELECT does not Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Lost in the shuffle? (Re: PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR) Bijan Parsia
• Re: ORDER BY allows expression, SELECT does not Dan Connolly
• Re: Protocol document: uri -> iri Dan Connolly
• Re: Lost in the shuffle? (Re: PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR) Dan Connolly
• ORDER BY allows expression, SELECT does not souripriya.das@oracle.com

Sunday, 26 March 2006

• Protocol document: uri -> iri souripriya.das@oracle.com
• Re: Lost in the shuffle? (Re: PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR) Bijan Parsia
• Lost in the shuffle? (Re: PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR) Bijan Parsia
• Re: PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR Dan Connolly
• Re: PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR Dan Connolly
• Re: PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR Dan Connolly
• Re: PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR souripriya.das@oracle.com

Saturday, 25 March 2006

• Re: PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR Dan Connolly
• Re: PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR souripriya.das@oracle.com

Friday, 24 March 2006

• Re: 1.115 of sparql protocol editor's draft Kendall Clark
• 1.115 of sparql protocol editor's draft Kendall Clark
• Re: SPARQL+JSON Elias Torres

Thursday, 23 March 2006

• Re: SPARQL+JSON Kendall Clark
• SPARQL+JSON Elias Torres
• Re: automatic extraction of rq23 examples Eric Prud'hommeaux

Wednesday, 22 March 2006

• Re: run Woden again? Lee Feigenbaum
• run Woden again? Kendall Clark
• Re: PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR Dan Connolly
• Tests for LIMIT/OFFSET Seaborne, Andy
• Re: PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR Kendall Clark
• PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR Dan Connolly

Tuesday, 21 March 2006

• Re: wsdl fun (re: ACTION: LeeF to try SPARQL WSDL files with Woden validator, report results.) Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: wsdl fun (re: ACTION: LeeF to try SPARQL WSDL files with Woden validator, report results.) Kendall Clark
• Re: wsdl fun (re: ACTION: LeeF to try SPARQL WSDL files with Woden validator, report results.) Dan Connolly
• wsdl fun (re: ACTION: LeeF to try SPARQL WSDL files with Woden validator, report results.) Lee Feigenbaum
• Meeting minutes: March 21st, 2006 Janne Saarela
• likely regrets Pat Hayes
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 21 March Sergio Tessaris

Monday, 20 March 2006

• LC comment status w.r.t. 2nd last call Dan Connolly
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 21 March Enrico Franconi
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 21 March Dan Connolly
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 21 March Kendall Clark
• agenda: RDF Data Access 21 March Dan Connolly
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 21 March: in progress Libby Miller
• agenda: RDF Data Access 21 March: in progress Dan Connolly
• Requirements coverage by test cases Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Meeting minutes: March 14th, 2006 souripriya.das@oracle.com
• regrets Sven Groppe

Sunday, 19 March 2006

• automatic extraction of rq23 examples Eric Prud'hommeaux

Wednesday, 15 March 2006

• Re: testcases Seaborne, Andy

Tuesday, 14 March 2006

• Re: Meeting minutes: March 14th, 2006 jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Re: Meeting minutes: March 14th, 2006 Elias Torres
• Meeting minutes: March 14th, 2006 Janne Saarela
• Re: agenda RDF Data Access 14 Mar: suggestions? Lee Feigenbaum
• testcases Sergio Tessaris
• Regrets (was: Re: agenda RDF Data Access 14 Mar: suggestions?) Jeen Broekstra

Monday, 13 March 2006

• agenda RDF Data Access 14 Mar: suggestions? Dan Connolly

Friday, 10 March 2006

• \u escapes Seaborne, Andy
• Re: proposed clarifications to the SPARQL grammar Seaborne, Andy

Thursday, 9 March 2006

• Re: proposed clarifications to the SPARQL grammar Dan Connolly
• proposed clarifications to the SPARQL grammar Eric Prud'hommeaux
• [Last Call] Registration of media type application/sparql-query (fwd) Dirk-Willem van Gulik
• [Last Call] Registration of media type application/sparql-query Eric Prud'hommeaux
• [Last Call] Registration of media type application/sparql-results+xml Eric Prud'hommeaux
• new mailing list: public-sparql-dev Dan Connolly

Wednesday, 8 March 2006

• Re: Comments on Feb 20 Working Draft of SPARQL Eric Prud'hommeaux

Tuesday, 7 March 2006

• draft minutes for ftf6 (02 - 03 March) Eric Prud'hommeaux

Monday, 6 March 2006

• Re: rq23 def'n "Pattern Solution" wrong? (and more on BGP') Enrico Franconi
• [Fwd: Re: Comment: don't use ? and $. Pick one. [OK?]] Dan Connolly
• [Fwd: Please take the W3C Technical Plenary Survey by 17 March.] Dan Connolly
• no DAWG agenda/teleconference this week Dan Connolly

Sunday, 5 March 2006

• Re: rq23 def'n "Pattern Solution" wrong? (and more on BGP') Pat Hayes

Friday, 3 March 2006

• Notes on ter Horst's comments: SPARQL Query Language Eric Prud'hommeaux

Thursday, 2 March 2006

• Re: rq23 def'n "Pattern Solution" wrong? (and more on BGP') Enrico Franconi

Wednesday, 1 March 2006

• Re: rq23 def'n "Pattern Solution" wrong? (and more on BGP') Pat Hayes
• Re: rq23 def'n "Pattern Solution" wrong? (and more on BGP') Enrico Franconi
• Re: rq23 def'n "Pattern Solution" wrong? (and more on BGP') Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: rq23 def'n "Pattern Solution" wrong? (and more on BGP') Enrico Franconi

Tuesday, 28 February 2006

• Re: rq23 def'n "Pattern Solution" wrong? (and more on BGP') Pat Hayes
• Re: rq23 def'n "Pattern Solution" wrong? (and more on BGP') Enrico Franconi

Saturday, 25 February 2006

• RDF DAWG face to face meeting 2-3 Mar 2006 Eric Prud'hommeaux

Friday, 24 February 2006

• [Fwd: Comments on Feb 20 Working Draft of SPARQL] Dan Connolly

Wednesday, 22 February 2006

• [Fwd: SPARQL: arguments for built-in calls to generic?] Seaborne, Andy

Tuesday, 21 February 2006

• WD-rdf-sparql-query-20060220 is out; rdfSemantics follow-up Dan Connolly
• Re: Technical Plenary f2f meeting plans -- SWIG and SWBP coordination Danny Ayers
• Meeting minutes : 2006-02-21 Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Technical Plenary f2f meeting plans -- SWIG and SWBP coordination Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 21 Feb Enrico Franconi
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 21 Feb Jeen Broekstra

Monday, 20 February 2006

• regrets [Was: agenda: RDF Data Access 21 Feb] jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 21 Feb Kendall Clark
• agenda: RDF Data Access 21 Feb Dan Connolly

Friday, 17 February 2006

• Re: rq23 def'n "Pattern Solution" wrong? (and more on BGP') Dan Connolly
• Re: ql wd qa check ok Dan Connolly
• Re: Essay on the basic ideas of RDF graph syntax. Dan Connolly

Thursday, 16 February 2006

• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 14 Feb Steve Harris
• Re: ql wd qa check ok Seaborne, Andy
• Re: ql wd qa check ok Lee Feigenbaum
• ql wd qa check ok Janne Saarela

Tuesday, 14 February 2006

• Meeting Minutes - Feb 14 Elias Torres

Thursday, 16 February 2006

• Meeting Minutes - Feb 14 Elias Torres

Wednesday, 15 February 2006

• Re: rq23 def'n "Pattern Solution" wrong? (and more on BGP') Dan Connolly

Tuesday, 14 February 2006

• Essay on the basic ideas of RDF graph syntax. Pat Hayes
• Re: [ANNOUNCE] participate in DAWG next steps discussion Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: [ANNOUNCE] participate in DAWG next steps discussion Kendall Clark
• Re: [ANNOUNCE] participate in DAWG next steps discussion Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: [ANNOUNCE] participate in DAWG next steps discussion Kendall Clark
• [ANNOUNCE] participate in DAWG next steps discussion Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: rq23 def'n "Pattern Solution" wrong? (and more on BGP') Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Seaborne, Andy
• told bnodes example Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Pat Hayes
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 14 Feb jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 14 Feb Libby Miller
• Regrets for telephone conference today Sven Groppe
• Re: Comparing xsd:strings Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 14 Feb Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 14 Feb Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: rq23 def'n "Pattern Solution" wrong? (and more on BGP') Enrico Franconi
• rq23 def'n "Pattern Solution" wrong? (and more on BGP') Lee Feigenbaum

Monday, 13 February 2006

• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Pat Hayes
• Re: [Fwd: draft SPARQL CR transition request] Dan Connolly
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Enrico Franconi
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Pat Hayes
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Dan Connolly
• Re: trouble with my ACTION (protocol/syntax extensibility) Dan Connolly
• trouble with my ACTION Kendall Clark
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Enrico Franconi
• agenda: RDF Data Access 14 Feb Dan Connolly
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Dan Connolly
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Seaborne, Andy

Saturday, 11 February 2006

• [Fwd: draft SPARQL CR transition request] Dan Connolly

Friday, 10 February 2006

• Re: Minutes telcon 7th February Dan Connolly
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Enrico Franconi

Wednesday, 8 February 2006

• Re: rq23 edits (v1.638) Dan Connolly
• rq23 edits (v1.638) Seaborne, Andy
• Re: changelog ACTION Kendall Clark
• Re: changelog ACTION Dan Connolly
• changelog ACTION Kendall Clark
• Minutes telcon 7th February Sven.Groppe@deri.org
• minutes, DAWG weekly 7-Feb Lee Feigenbaum

Monday, 6 February 2006

• Re: Comparing xsd:strings Steve Harris
• Comparing xsd:strings Seaborne, Andy
• Draft response to: [Fwd: SPARQL Comments (Personal)] Seaborne, Andy

Sunday, 5 February 2006

• regrets Kendall Clark

Saturday, 4 February 2006

• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Enrico Franconi

Friday, 3 February 2006

• Questions on the latest SPARQL draft... Axel Polleres

Thursday, 2 February 2006

• Regrets for next telephone conference 7th February 2006 Sven Groppe
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Enrico Franconi
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Seaborne, Andy

Tuesday, 31 January 2006

• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Enrico Franconi

Wednesday, 1 February 2006

• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Pat Hayes
• "SPARQL++" example queries Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Minutes of RDF Data Access 31 Jan tessaris
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 tessaris
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 tessaris

Tuesday, 31 January 2006

• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Pat Hayes
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Pat Hayes
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Enrico Franconi

Monday, 30 January 2006

• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Pat Hayes
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Pat Hayes
• Re: agenda RDF Data Access 31 Jan: in progress jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Re: Blank nodes and predicates jos.deroo@agfa.com
• agenda RDF Data Access 31 Jan: in progress Dan Connolly
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Pat Hayes
• Re: Blank nodes and predicates Pat Hayes
• Re: Blank nodes and predicates Pat Hayes
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Enrico Franconi
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Pat Hayes
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Enrico Franconi
• (partial) regrets for jan 31 Jeen Broekstra
• out for next three and half weeks souripriya.das@oracle.com
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Enrico Franconi
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Seaborne, Andy
• Defn of BGP-equivalence (was: Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5) Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Enrico Franconi
• Re: Blank nodes and predicates Enrico Franconi
• Re: CONSTRUCT operator Seaborne, Andy
• Blank nodes and predicates Seaborne, Andy

Sunday, 29 January 2006

• Answer to: semantics are poorly specified Sergio Tessaris

Saturday, 28 January 2006

• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Enrico Franconi
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Enrico Franconi
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Pat Hayes
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Pat Hayes
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 jos.deroo@agfa.com

Friday, 27 January 2006

• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Enrico Franconi
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Enrico Franconi
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Re: Draft response to: Re: major technical: blank nodes Pat Hayes
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Pat Hayes
• SPARQL Protocol for RDF LC Working Draft Published Kendall Clark
• Re: Draft response to: Re: major technical: blank nodes Pat Hayes
• Re: Draft response to: Re: major technical: blank nodes Pat Hayes
• Editorial changes in Section 2.5 Enrico Franconi
• Re: minutes of RDF Data Access 26 Jan Jeen Broekstra
• Re: Draft response to: Re: major technical: blank nodes Enrico Franconi
• Re: The theoreticians got rid of the OrderedMerge Enrico Franconi
• Re: Draft response to: Re: major technical: blank nodes Souripriya Das

Thursday, 26 January 2006

• minutes of RDF Data Access 26 Jan Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Draft response to: Re: major technical: blank nodes Dan Connolly
• Draft response to: Re: major technical: blank nodes Pat Hayes
• Re: CONSTRUCT operator Pat Hayes
• Re: The theoreticians got rid of the OrderedMerge Pat Hayes
• Re: The theoreticians got rid of the OrderedMerge Pat Hayes
• Re: The theoreticians got rid of the OrderedMerge Pat Hayes
• meeting record of RDF Data Access 24 Jan Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: CONSTRUCT operator tessaris
• Bnode names in the answer Enrico Franconi
• Re: The theoreticians got rid of the OrderedMerge Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Editing rq23 for BGP matching Enrico Franconi
• Editing rq23 for BGP matching Seaborne, Andy
• Re: The theoreticians got rid of the OrderedMerge Enrico Franconi
• Re: The theoreticians got rid of the OrderedMerge Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching Seaborne, Andy
• Re: The theoreticians got rid of the OrderedMerge Enrico Franconi

Wednesday, 25 January 2006

• agenda: RDF Data Access 25 Jan Dan Connolly
• Re: CONSTRUCT operator jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Re: The theoreticians got rid of the OrderedMerge Pat Hayes
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching Enrico Franconi
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching Pat Hayes
• Re: The theoreticians got rid of the OrderedMerge Enrico Franconi
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching Pat Hayes
• Re: The theoreticians got rid of the OrderedMerge Seaborne, Andy
• Re: CONSTRUCT operator Pat Hayes
• Re: The theoreticians got rid of the OrderedMerge Enrico Franconi
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching Enrico Franconi
• Re: olive branch (was: Re: FUB on Pat's proposal for BGP matching (please read)) Pat Hayes
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching Enrico Franconi
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching Enrico Franconi
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching Enrico Franconi
• Re: The theoreticians got rid of the OrderedMerge Seaborne, Andy
• Re: CONSTRUCT operator Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching Seaborne, Andy
• CONSTRUCT operator Sergio Tessaris

Tuesday, 24 January 2006

• Re: FW: Grammar updated to reflect BGP/Constraint interpretation Seaborne, Andy
• Re: olive branch (was: Re: FUB on Pat's proposal for BGP matching (please read)) Enrico Franconi
• Re: http://www.w3.org/2006/01/17-dawg-minutes.html#action05 Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Email problems? (RE: Editorial thread for BGP matching) Pat Hayes
• The bloody theoreticians got rid of the OrderedMerge Enrico Franconi
• olive branch (was: Re: FUB on Pat's proposal for BGP matching (please read)) Pat Hayes
• RE: FW: Grammar updated to reflect BGP/Constraint interpretation Seaborne, Andy
• Re: FW: Grammar updated to reflect BGP/Constraint interpretation tessaris
• RE: FW: Grammar updated to reflect BGP/Constraint interpretation Seaborne, Andy
• Re: FW: Grammar updated to reflect BGP/Constraint interpretation tessaris
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 24 Jan Jeen Broekstra
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching Seaborne, Andy
• FUB on Pat's proposal for BGP matching (please read) Enrico Franconi
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching Patrick J. Hayes
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching Patrick J. Hayes
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching Patrick J. Hayes

Monday, 23 January 2006

• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching Enrico Franconi
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching Enrico Franconi
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching Pat Hayes
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching Pat Hayes
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 24 Jan Libby Miller
• agenda: RDF Data Access 24 Jan Dan Connolly
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching Enrico Franconi
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching Dan Connolly
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching Enrico Franconi
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching Enrico Franconi
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching Enrico Franconi
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching Pat Hayes
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching Enrico Franconi
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching Enrico Franconi
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching Pat Hayes
• FW: Grammar updated to reflect BGP/Constraint interpretation Seaborne, Andy

Sunday, 22 January 2006

• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching Enrico Franconi

Saturday, 21 January 2006

• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching Enrico Franconi
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching Enrico Franconi
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching Enrico Franconi
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Bijan Parsia
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Enrico Franconi

Friday, 20 January 2006

• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching Pat Hayes
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Pat Hayes
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Pat Hayes
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching Enrico Franconi
• Editorial thread for BGP matching Seaborne, Andy
• Additional text for SPARQL matching extensibility Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Wording change (was : Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns) Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Enrico Franconi
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Enrico Franconi
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Enrico Franconi
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Enrico Franconi
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Bijan Parsia
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Bijan Parsia
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Bijan Parsia
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Bijan Parsia
• Re: Wording change (was : Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns) Enrico Franconi

Thursday, 19 January 2006

• Re: Wording change (was : Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns) Enrico Franconi
• Re: Wording change (was : Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns) Enrico Franconi
• Re: Wording change (was : Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns) Enrico Franconi
• Re: Wording change (was : Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns) Enrico Franconi
• Re: Wording change (was : Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns) Enrico Franconi
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Enrico Franconi
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Pat Hayes
• Re: Wording change (was : Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns) Pat Hayes
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Pat Hayes
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Pat Hayes
• Re: Wording change (was : Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns) Pat Hayes
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Enrico Franconi
• Re: 7 tests to induct xsd:boolean into SPARQL Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Pat Hayes
• Re: 7 tests to induct xsd:boolean into SPARQL Dan Connolly

Wednesday, 18 January 2006

• Intro + question Sven Groppe

Thursday, 19 January 2006

• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Bijan Parsia
• Re: 7 tests to induct xsd:boolean into SPARQL Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Bijan Parsia
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Enrico Franconi
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Bijan Parsia
• Re: Wording change (was : Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns) Enrico Franconi
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Enrico Franconi

Wednesday, 18 January 2006

• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Pat Hayes
• Wording change (was : Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns) Pat Hayes
• Re: SHOULD use POST for expensive queries? Pat Hayes
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Pat Hayes
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Pat Hayes
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Re: SHOULD use POST for expensive queries? Kendall Clark
• Re: DAWG 19 Jan cancelled; tune in Tue 24 Jan Libby Miller
• DAWG 19 Jan cancelled; tune in Tue 24 Jan Dan Connolly
• Re: SHOULD use POST for expensive queries? Dan Connolly
• Re: SHOULD use POST for expensive queries? Steve Harris
• Re: SHOULD use POST for expensive queries? Jeen Broekstra
• Re: Intro + question Seaborne, Andy
• Re: SHOULD use POST for expensive queries? Kendall Clark
• Re: SHOULD use POST for expensive queries? Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Technical Plenary f2f meeting plans Seaborne, Andy
• SHOULD use POST for expensive queries? Kendall Clark
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Enrico Franconi
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Bijan Parsia
• Intro + question Sven Groppe
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Enrico Franconi
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Enrico Franconi
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Pat Hayes
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Pat Hayes
• Re: Technical Plenary f2f meeting plans Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Technical Plenary f2f meeting plans Kendall Clark
• Re: Technical Plenary f2f meeting plans Kendall Clark
• Re: Technical Plenary f2f meeting plans Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Technical Plenary f2f meeting plans Kendall Clark
• clarification of EBV returning an xsd: boolean@w3.org Eric Prud'hommeaux
• integer added to supported data types (minor editorial Eric Prud'hommeaux
• text on BASE constraints in rq23 (minor substantive) Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Technical Plenary f2f meeting plans Eric Prud'hommeaux

Tuesday, 17 January 2006

• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Enrico Franconi
• Re: apology/erratum Enrico Franconi
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Enrico Franconi
• Re: http://www.w3.org/2006/01/17-dawg-minutes.html#action05 Dan Connolly
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Pat Hayes
• http://www.w3.org/2006/01/17-dawg-minutes.html#action05 Pat Hayes
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Dan Connolly
• Re: URI serialization issues Pat Hayes
• Re: [Fwd: Incorrect braces in Sparql test cases] Steve Harris
• apology/erratum Pat Hayes
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Pat Hayes
• Re: Minutes of the DAWG telecon 2006-Jan-17 Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Minutes of the DAWG telecon 2006-Jan-17 Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Enrico Franconi
• Re: URI serialization issues Kendall Clark
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Pat Hayes
• Re: [Fwd: Incorrect braces in Sparql test cases] Dan Connolly
• Re: [Fwd: Incorrect braces in Sparql test cases] Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: [Fwd: Incorrect braces in Sparql test cases] Jeen Broekstra
• [Fwd: Incorrect braces in Sparql test cases] Seaborne, Andy
• [Fwd: minor technical on 10.3 Constructing an output graph] Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (rdfSemantics) Seaborne, Andy
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 17 Jan (in progress) jos.deroo@agfa.com
• TypePromotion tests Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (rdfSemantics) Enrico Franconi
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 17 Jan (in progress) Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (rdfSemantics) Dan Connolly

Monday, 16 January 2006

• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 17 Jan (in progress) Steve Harris
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Bijan Parsia
• agenda: RDF Data Access 17 Jan (in progress) Dan Connolly
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Seaborne, Andy

Sunday, 15 January 2006

• Re: all the SPARLQ policy stuff I can find Kendall Clark
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Enrico Franconi
• protcol trace of kanji1 Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Enrico Franconi
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Seaborne, Andy
• Jan 12 Minutes Elias Torres
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Bijan Parsia
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Dan Connolly

Saturday, 14 January 2006

• Final text for Basic Graph Patterns Enrico Franconi

Friday, 13 January 2006

• Re: 7 tests to induct xsd:boolean into SPARQL Seaborne, Andy
• Re: [Fwd: major technical: no subqueries] Seaborne, Andy
• Re: bnodeification (rdfSemantics) Pat Hayes
• Re: 7 tests to induct xsd:boolean into SPARQL Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: "the graphs referred to in the FROM clauses" [comment: major technical: underspecified errors] (SOURCE, rdfSemantics) Dan Connolly
• Re: "the graphs referred to in the FROM clauses" [comment: major technical: underspecified errors] Pat Hayes
• Re: [Fwd: Major technical comment: identifier length] Dan Connolly
• Re: [Fwd: Major technical comment: identifier length] Bijan Parsia
• Re: [Fwd: Major technical comment: identifier length] Dan Connolly
• Re: [Fwd: Major technical comment: identifier length] Seaborne, Andy
• Re: [Fwd: major technical: no subqueries] Seaborne, Andy
• Re: 7 tests to induct xsd:boolean into SPARQL Seaborne, Andy
• Re: [Fwd: major technical: no subqueries] Jeen Broekstra
• Re: [Fwd: Major technical comment: identifier length] Bijan Parsia
• 7 tests to induct xsd:boolean into SPARQL Eric Prud'hommeaux
• [Fwd: minor technical: A.7 grammar, rule [25] Constraint] punctuationSyntax Dan Connolly
• [Fwd: Major technical comment: identifier length] Dan Connolly
• Re: [Fwd: major technical: no subqueries] jos.deroo@agfa.com

Thursday, 12 January 2006

• Re: [Fwd: major technical: no subqueries] Kendall Clark
• [Fwd: major technical: no subqueries] Dan Connolly
• "the graphs referred to in the FROM clauses" [comment: major technical: underspecified errors] Dan Connolly
• valueTesting and divide-by-zero [comment: major technical: underspecified errors] Dan Connolly
• Re: bnodeification (rdfSemantics) Dan Connolly
• Re: Text about rejecting queries with unacceptable dataset descriptions Kendall Clark
• Re: bnodeification Pat Hayes
• Re: bnodeification Souripriya Das
• Re: bnodeification Pat Hayes
• RE: protocol draft updated Seaborne, Andy
• Re: bnodeification Sergio Tessaris
• Re: bnodeification Enrico Franconi
• Text about rejecting queries with unacceptable dataset descriptions Seaborne, Andy

Wednesday, 11 January 2006

• Re: bnodeification Pat Hayes
• protocol draft updated Kendall Clark
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused Kendall Clark
• agenda: RDF Data Access Thu 12 Jan 1600Z Dan Connolly
• comment: SPARQL and Unicode versions Dan Connolly
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused Seaborne, Andy
• Re: why */* in inputSerialization of POST binding? Dan Connolly
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused Seaborne, Andy
• why */* in inputSerialization of POST binding? Kendall Clark
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused Kendall Clark
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused Steve Harris
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused Kendall Clark
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused Seaborne, Andy
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused Kendall Clark
• Re: bnodeification tessaris
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused Steve Harris

Tuesday, 10 January 2006

• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused Kendall Clark
• Re: bnodeification (was: Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns) Pat Hayes
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused Seaborne, Andy
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused Kendall Clark
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused Seaborne, Andy
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 10 Jan 14:30Z Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: bnodeification (was: Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns) Pat Hayes
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused Kendall Clark
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused Seaborne, Andy
• Re: bnodeification (was: Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns) Souripriya Das
• Re: bnodeification (was: Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns) jos.deroo@agfa.com

Monday, 9 January 2006

• bnodeification (was: Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns) Pat Hayes
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 10 Jan 14:30Z Dan Connolly
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 10 Jan 14:30Z Elias Torres
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 10 Jan 14:30Z Kendall Clark
• agenda: RDF Data Access 10 Jan 14:30Z Dan Connolly
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused Kendall Clark
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused Kendall Clark
• Regrets for Jan 12th and Jan 17th telecons Steve Harris
• regrets for jan 10 telcon Jeen Broekstra
• minutes RDF Data Access 05 Jan Jeen Broekstra

Sunday, 8 January 2006

• Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns Sergio Tessaris

Saturday, 7 January 2006

• Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns jos.deroo@agfa.com

Friday, 6 January 2006

• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused Seaborne, Andy
• tweaked language for QueryRequestRefused Kendall Clark
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused Kendall Clark
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused Seaborne, Andy
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused Kendall Clark
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused Seaborne, Andy
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused Kendall Clark
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused Seaborne, Andy

Thursday, 5 January 2006

• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused Kendall Clark
• New proposed changes by FUB Enrico Franconi
• FW: Suspicious notation in SPARQL lexical rule for STRING_LITERAL_LONG1 [OK?] Seaborne, Andy
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused Seaborne, Andy
• Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns Bijan Parsia
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused Kendall Clark
• Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns Bijan Parsia
• Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns Dan Connolly
• Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns Seaborne, Andy
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused Seaborne, Andy
• Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns Sergio Tessaris
• Re: reminder: no DAWG telcon Tue 3 Jan; next telcon is Thu, 5 Jan 11amET/1600UTC Enrico Franconi
• Re: reminder: no DAWG telcon Tue 3 Jan; next telcon is Thu, 5 Jan 11amET/1600UTC Enrico Franconi
• Proposed changes by FUB Enrico Franconi

Wednesday, 4 January 2006

• Query by Reference Kendall Clark

Tuesday, 3 January 2006

• Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns Pat Hayes

Wednesday, 4 January 2006

• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 5 Jan Kendall Clark
• agenda: RDF Data Access 5 Jan Dan Connolly
• Re: comment: QName production in SPARQL grammar; reconsider punctuationSyntax? Kendall Clark
• Re: reminder: no DAWG telcon Tue 3 Jan; next telcon is Thu, 5 Jan 11amET/1600UTC Bijan Parsia
• Re: comment: QName production in SPARQL grammar; reconsider punctuationSyntax? Dan Connolly
• Re: reminder: no DAWG telcon Tue 3 Jan; next telcon is Thu, 5 Jan 11amET/1600UTC Libby Miller

Tuesday, 3 January 2006

• Re: how to subsume or handle warnings? Kendall Clark
• Re: how to subsume or handle warnings? Seaborne, Andy
• Re: scribe for DAWG telcon Thu, 5 Jan, please? Jeen Broekstra
• reminder: no DAWG telcon Tue 3 Jan; next telcon is Thu, 5 Jan 11amET/1600UTC Dan Connolly
• scribe for DAWG telcon Thu, 5 Jan, please? Dan Connolly

Monday, 2 January 2006

• Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns Pat Hayes
• Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns Pat Hayes
• Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns Pat Hayes
• Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns Sergio Tessaris
• Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns Enrico Franconi

Last message date: Friday, 31 March 2006 06:57:19 UTC