- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:49:09 -0500
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20060113014908.GI7513@w3.org>
A while ago, it became clear that, since we were talking about xsd:boolean in the spec, the type should probably be recognized by SPARQL. To that end, I've created these tests: EBV result is the same as xsd:boolean -> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#boolean-logical-or "false"^^xsd:boolean = "0"^^xsd:boolean -> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#boolean-equiv-false "true"^^xsd:boolean = "1"^^xsd:boolean -> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#boolean-equiv-true T=T T=1 1=T 1=1 F=F F=0 0=F 0=0 -> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#boolean-equiv-xsdtype graph match canonical lexical form of "false" -> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#boolean-false-canonical graph match on the canonical lexical form of "true" -> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#boolean-true-canonical = match on the canonical lexical result of an EBV -> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#boolean-ebv-canonical -- -eric office: +81.466.49.1170 W3C, Keio Research Institute at SFC, Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Keio University, 5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-8520 JAPAN +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA cell: +81.90.6533.3882 (eric@w3.org) Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than email address distribution.
Received on Friday, 13 January 2006 01:49:12 UTC