Re: ql wd qa check ok

Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> Before publishing this in any format, could we fix 
> 
> """
> F. G. Acknowledgements
> """
> 
> and
> 
> """
> G. H. Change Log
> """
> 
> please? :-)
> 
> Lee

Done.

I put in an appendix D as well.

	Andy

> 
> 
> public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org wrote on 02/16/2006 09:45:55 AM:
> 
>> I promised to give a look at the latest cvs version 1.640 of
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/
>>
>> This version is ok from my perspective to proceed to an updated working 
>> draft - I merely read the whole document through paying attention to 
>> changes since the November WD.
>>
>> Janne
>> -- 
>> Janne Saarela <janne.saarela at profium.com>
>> Profium, Lars Sonckin kaari 12, 02600 Espoo, Finland
>> Internet: http://www.profium.com
>>
>>
> 
> 

Received on Thursday, 16 February 2006 17:08:23 UTC