- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:37:21 +0000
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Dan Connolly wrote:
> This seems like a reasonably coherent argument for a new requirement,
> complete with rationale and use case.
>
> If you support this requirement and would like to see us add it
> to the critical path, please say so.
>
> If not, please help me come up with justification that might
> satisfy the commentor.
The query :
SELECT ?name
WHERE { ?x foaf:givenName ?name .
FILTER ( ! ( ASK ?date WHERE { ?x dc:date ?date } ) ) }
is very much like:
SELECT ?name
WHERE { ?x foaf:givenName ?name .
UNSAID { ?x dc:date ?date }
}
Close issue:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#unsaid
Closed at Helsinki:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf4.html#item04
Andy
Received on Friday, 13 January 2006 20:37:39 UTC