- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 12:21:58 -0600
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
>On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 16:50 -0600, Pat Hayes wrote: >> <<After volunteering for this I noticed that Dan >> had already responded to this message with an >> [OK?], so this might now be redundant. > >oops. > >> But here >> goes anyway.>> > > >> [...] >> >In addition, the term "blank node" creates a false analogy with RDF. >> >An RDF blank node is a node in a graph with no IRI. A SPARQL blank node >> >is not a node at all, it is actually a variable that cannot be named in >> >the SELECT list. >> >> We disagree. > >That's the sort of place where I like to refer to a recorded >decision. Ah, yes, I should do that. > >Your message is full of argument that isn't directly supported >by WG records. That's fine if the WG endorses it... > >Meanwhile, I took some similar liberties in my message... >some of which are arguably wrong. > >Hmm... I'll have to think this over. No, lets stick to protocol, it would be a good discipline to get back to. Sorry I squirted this off in 'explain intuition' mode rather than 'respond official' mode. I will correct in time for Tuesday. Pat > >-- >Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ >D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 cell phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Friday, 27 January 2006 18:22:08 UTC