public-rdf-dawg@w3.org from January to March 2006 by author

Axel Polleres

• Questions on the latest SPARQL draft... (Friday, 3 February)

Bijan Parsia

• Re: Lost in the shuffle? (Re: PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR) (Monday, 27 March)
• Re: Lost in the shuffle? (Re: PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR) (Sunday, 26 March)
• Lost in the shuffle? (Re: PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR) (Sunday, 26 March)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Saturday, 21 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Monday, 16 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Sunday, 15 January)
• Re: [Fwd: Major technical comment: identifier length] (Friday, 13 January)
• Re: [Fwd: Major technical comment: identifier length] (Friday, 13 January)
• Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns (Thursday, 5 January)
• Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns (Thursday, 5 January)
• Re: reminder: no DAWG telcon Tue 3 Jan; next telcon is Thu, 5 Jan 11amET/1600UTC (Wednesday, 4 January)

Dan Connolly

• Re: automatic extraction of rq23 examples (Thursday, 30 March)
• Re: re-opening the DESCRIBE issue (Thursday, 30 March)
• re-opening the DESCRIBE issue (Wednesday, 29 March)
• Re: 1.115 of sparql protocol editor's draft (WSDL2 cite) (Wednesday, 29 March)
• Re: [Fwd: rif-ucr published] "Rule Interchange Format Use Cases and Requirements" (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Re: SPARQL+JSON (Monday, 27 March)
• Re: 1.115 of sparql protocol editor's draft (WSDL2 cite) (Monday, 27 March)
• agenda: RDF Data Access 28 Mar (Monday, 27 March)
• Re: Meeting minutes: March 21st, 2006 (Monday, 27 March)
• Re: 1.115 of sparql protocol editor's draft (WSDL2 cite) (Monday, 27 March)
• nameValueForms: ok to postpone? (Monday, 27 March)
• agenda: RDF Data Access 28 Mar: in progress (Monday, 27 March)
• Re: ORDER BY allows expression, SELECT does not (Monday, 27 March)
• Re: Protocol document: uri -> iri (Monday, 27 March)
• Re: Lost in the shuffle? (Re: PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR) (Monday, 27 March)
• Re: PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR (Sunday, 26 March)
• Re: PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR (Sunday, 26 March)
• Re: PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR (Sunday, 26 March)
• Re: PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR (Saturday, 25 March)
• Re: PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR (Wednesday, 22 March)
• PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR (Wednesday, 22 March)
• Re: wsdl fun (re: ACTION: LeeF to try SPARQL WSDL files with Woden validator, report results.) (Tuesday, 21 March)
• LC comment status w.r.t. 2nd last call (Monday, 20 March)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 21 March (Monday, 20 March)
• agenda: RDF Data Access 21 March (Monday, 20 March)
• agenda: RDF Data Access 21 March: in progress (Monday, 20 March)
• agenda RDF Data Access 14 Mar: suggestions? (Monday, 13 March)
• Re: proposed clarifications to the SPARQL grammar (Thursday, 9 March)
• new mailing list: public-sparql-dev (Thursday, 9 March)
• [Fwd: Re: Comment: don't use ? and $. Pick one. [OK?]] (Monday, 6 March)
• [Fwd: Please take the W3C Technical Plenary Survey by 17 March.] (Monday, 6 March)
• no DAWG agenda/teleconference this week (Monday, 6 March)
• [Fwd: Comments on Feb 20 Working Draft of SPARQL] (Friday, 24 February)
• WD-rdf-sparql-query-20060220 is out; rdfSemantics follow-up (Tuesday, 21 February)
• agenda: RDF Data Access 21 Feb (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: rq23 def'n "Pattern Solution" wrong? (and more on BGP') (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: ql wd qa check ok (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: Essay on the basic ideas of RDF graph syntax. (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: rq23 def'n "Pattern Solution" wrong? (and more on BGP') (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: [Fwd: draft SPARQL CR transition request] (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: trouble with my ACTION (protocol/syntax extensibility) (Monday, 13 February)
• agenda: RDF Data Access 14 Feb (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Monday, 13 February)
• [Fwd: draft SPARQL CR transition request] (Saturday, 11 February)
• Re: Minutes telcon 7th February (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: rq23 edits (v1.638) (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: changelog ACTION (Wednesday, 8 February)
• agenda RDF Data Access 31 Jan: in progress (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: Draft response to: Re: major technical: blank nodes (Thursday, 26 January)
• agenda: RDF Data Access 25 Jan (Wednesday, 25 January)
• agenda: RDF Data Access 24 Jan (Monday, 23 January)
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching (Monday, 23 January)
• Re: 7 tests to induct xsd:boolean into SPARQL (Thursday, 19 January)
• DAWG 19 Jan cancelled; tune in Tue 24 Jan (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Re: SHOULD use POST for expensive queries? (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Re: http://www.w3.org/2006/01/17-dawg-minutes.html#action05 (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: [Fwd: Incorrect braces in Sparql test cases] (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (rdfSemantics) (Tuesday, 17 January)
• agenda: RDF Data Access 17 Jan (in progress) (Monday, 16 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Sunday, 15 January)
• Re: "the graphs referred to in the FROM clauses" [comment: major technical: underspecified errors] (SOURCE, rdfSemantics) (Friday, 13 January)
• Re: [Fwd: Major technical comment: identifier length] (Friday, 13 January)
• Re: [Fwd: Major technical comment: identifier length] (Friday, 13 January)
• [Fwd: minor technical: A.7 grammar, rule [25] Constraint] punctuationSyntax (Friday, 13 January)
• [Fwd: Major technical comment: identifier length] (Friday, 13 January)
• [Fwd: major technical: no subqueries] (Thursday, 12 January)
• "the graphs referred to in the FROM clauses" [comment: major technical: underspecified errors] (Thursday, 12 January)
• valueTesting and divide-by-zero [comment: major technical: underspecified errors] (Thursday, 12 January)
• Re: bnodeification (rdfSemantics) (Thursday, 12 January)
• agenda: RDF Data Access Thu 12 Jan 1600Z (Wednesday, 11 January)
• comment: SPARQL and Unicode versions (Wednesday, 11 January)
• Re: why */* in inputSerialization of POST binding? (Wednesday, 11 January)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 10 Jan 14:30Z (Monday, 9 January)
• agenda: RDF Data Access 10 Jan 14:30Z (Monday, 9 January)
• Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns (Thursday, 5 January)
• agenda: RDF Data Access 5 Jan (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Re: comment: QName production in SPARQL grammar; reconsider punctuationSyntax? (Wednesday, 4 January)
• reminder: no DAWG telcon Tue 3 Jan; next telcon is Thu, 5 Jan 11amET/1600UTC (Tuesday, 3 January)
• scribe for DAWG telcon Thu, 5 Jan, please? (Tuesday, 3 January)

Danny Ayers

• Re: Technical Plenary f2f meeting plans -- SWIG and SWBP coordination (Tuesday, 21 February)

Dirk-Willem van Gulik

• [Last Call] Registration of media type application/sparql-query (fwd) (Thursday, 9 March)

Elias Torres

• Re: SPARQL+JSON (Friday, 24 March)
• SPARQL+JSON (Thursday, 23 March)
• Re: Meeting minutes: March 14th, 2006 (Tuesday, 14 March)
• Meeting Minutes - Feb 14 (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Meeting Minutes - Feb 14 (Thursday, 16 February)
• Jan 12 Minutes (Sunday, 15 January)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 10 Jan 14:30Z (Monday, 9 January)

Enrico Franconi

• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 28 Mar (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 21 March (Monday, 20 March)
• Re: rq23 def'n "Pattern Solution" wrong? (and more on BGP') (Monday, 6 March)
• Re: rq23 def'n "Pattern Solution" wrong? (and more on BGP') (Thursday, 2 March)
• Re: rq23 def'n "Pattern Solution" wrong? (and more on BGP') (Wednesday, 1 March)
• Re: rq23 def'n "Pattern Solution" wrong? (and more on BGP') (Wednesday, 1 March)
• Re: rq23 def'n "Pattern Solution" wrong? (and more on BGP') (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 21 Feb (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: rq23 def'n "Pattern Solution" wrong? (and more on BGP') (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Saturday, 4 February)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Tuesday, 31 January)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Tuesday, 31 January)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: Blank nodes and predicates (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Saturday, 28 January)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Saturday, 28 January)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Friday, 27 January)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Friday, 27 January)
• Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Friday, 27 January)
• Re: Draft response to: Re: major technical: blank nodes (Friday, 27 January)
• Re: The theoreticians got rid of the OrderedMerge (Friday, 27 January)
• Bnode names in the answer (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: Editing rq23 for BGP matching (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: The theoreticians got rid of the OrderedMerge (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: The theoreticians got rid of the OrderedMerge (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: The theoreticians got rid of the OrderedMerge (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: The theoreticians got rid of the OrderedMerge (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: olive branch (was: Re: FUB on Pat's proposal for BGP matching (please read)) (Tuesday, 24 January)
• The bloody theoreticians got rid of the OrderedMerge (Tuesday, 24 January)
• FUB on Pat's proposal for BGP matching (please read) (Tuesday, 24 January)
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching (Monday, 23 January)
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching (Monday, 23 January)
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching (Monday, 23 January)
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching (Monday, 23 January)
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching (Monday, 23 January)
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching (Monday, 23 January)
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching (Monday, 23 January)
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching (Monday, 23 January)
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching (Sunday, 22 January)
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching (Saturday, 21 January)
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching (Saturday, 21 January)
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching (Saturday, 21 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Saturday, 21 January)
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: Wording change (was : Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns) (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: Wording change (was : Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns) (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: Wording change (was : Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns) (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: Wording change (was : Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns) (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: Wording change (was : Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns) (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: Wording change (was : Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns) (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: Wording change (was : Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns) (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: apology/erratum (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (rdfSemantics) (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Sunday, 15 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Sunday, 15 January)
• Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Saturday, 14 January)
• Re: bnodeification (Thursday, 12 January)
• New proposed changes by FUB (Thursday, 5 January)
• Re: reminder: no DAWG telcon Tue 3 Jan; next telcon is Thu, 5 Jan 11amET/1600UTC (Thursday, 5 January)
• Re: reminder: no DAWG telcon Tue 3 Jan; next telcon is Thu, 5 Jan 11amET/1600UTC (Thursday, 5 January)
• Proposed changes by FUB (Thursday, 5 January)
• Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns (Monday, 2 January)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• Re: re-opening the DESCRIBE issue (Friday, 31 March)
• Re: automatic extraction of rq23 examples (Thursday, 23 March)
• automatic extraction of rq23 examples (Sunday, 19 March)
• proposed clarifications to the SPARQL grammar (Thursday, 9 March)
• [Last Call] Registration of media type application/sparql-query (Thursday, 9 March)
• [Last Call] Registration of media type application/sparql-results+xml (Thursday, 9 March)
• Re: Comments on Feb 20 Working Draft of SPARQL (Wednesday, 8 March)
• draft minutes for ftf6 (02 - 03 March) (Tuesday, 7 March)
• Notes on ter Horst's comments: SPARQL Query Language (Friday, 3 March)
• RDF DAWG face to face meeting 2-3 Mar 2006 (Saturday, 25 February)
• Re: Technical Plenary f2f meeting plans -- SWIG and SWBP coordination (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: [ANNOUNCE] participate in DAWG next steps discussion (Tuesday, 14 February)
• [ANNOUNCE] participate in DAWG next steps discussion (Tuesday, 14 February)
• told bnodes example (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: Comparing xsd:strings (Tuesday, 14 February)
• "SPARQL++" example queries (Wednesday, 1 February)
• meeting record of RDF Data Access 24 Jan (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: Technical Plenary f2f meeting plans (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Re: Technical Plenary f2f meeting plans (Wednesday, 18 January)
• clarification of EBV returning an xsd: boolean@w3.org (Wednesday, 18 January)
• integer added to supported data types (minor editorial (Wednesday, 18 January)
• text on BASE constraints in rq23 (minor substantive) (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Technical Plenary f2f meeting plans (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Re: Minutes of the DAWG telecon 2006-Jan-17 (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: [Fwd: Incorrect braces in Sparql test cases] (Tuesday, 17 January)
• TypePromotion tests (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 17 Jan (in progress) (Tuesday, 17 January)
• protcol trace of kanji1 (Sunday, 15 January)
• Re: 7 tests to induct xsd:boolean into SPARQL (Friday, 13 January)
• 7 tests to induct xsd:boolean into SPARQL (Friday, 13 January)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 10 Jan 14:30Z (Tuesday, 10 January)

Janne Saarela

• Meeting minutes: March 21st, 2006 (Tuesday, 21 March)
• Meeting minutes: March 14th, 2006 (Tuesday, 14 March)
• ql wd qa check ok (Thursday, 16 February)

Jeen Broekstra

• test suite maintenance: Syntax vs. Query tests (Wednesday, 29 March)
• apologies for no-show @ yesterday's telcon (Wednesday, 29 March)
• Regrets (was: Re: agenda RDF Data Access 14 Mar: suggestions?) (Tuesday, 14 March)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 21 Feb (Tuesday, 21 February)
• (partial) regrets for jan 31 (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: minutes of RDF Data Access 26 Jan (Friday, 27 January)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 24 Jan (Tuesday, 24 January)
• Re: SHOULD use POST for expensive queries? (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Re: [Fwd: Incorrect braces in Sparql test cases] (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: [Fwd: major technical: no subqueries] (Friday, 13 January)
• regrets for jan 10 telcon (Monday, 9 January)
• minutes RDF Data Access 05 Jan (Monday, 9 January)
• Re: scribe for DAWG telcon Thu, 5 Jan, please? (Tuesday, 3 January)

jos.deroo@agfa.com

• Re: Meeting minutes: March 14th, 2006 (Tuesday, 14 March)
• regrets [Was: agenda: RDF Data Access 21 Feb] (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 14 Feb (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: agenda RDF Data Access 31 Jan: in progress (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: Blank nodes and predicates (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Saturday, 28 January)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Friday, 27 January)
• Re: CONSTRUCT operator (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 17 Jan (in progress) (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: [Fwd: major technical: no subqueries] (Friday, 13 January)
• Re: bnodeification (was: Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns) (Tuesday, 10 January)
• Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns (Saturday, 7 January)

Kendall Clark

• minutes from 28 March (Friday, 31 March)
• Re: Review of JSON results format document (Thursday, 30 March)
• Re: re-opening the DESCRIBE issue (Wednesday, 29 March)
• Re: 1.115 of sparql protocol editor's draft (WSDL2 cite) (Wednesday, 29 March)
• Re: 1.115 of sparql protocol editor's draft (WSDL2 cite) (Monday, 27 March)
• Re: nameValueForms: ok to postpone? (Monday, 27 March)
• Re: 1.115 of sparql protocol editor's draft (Friday, 24 March)
• 1.115 of sparql protocol editor's draft (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: SPARQL+JSON (Thursday, 23 March)
• run Woden again? (Wednesday, 22 March)
• Re: PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR (Wednesday, 22 March)
• Re: wsdl fun (re: ACTION: LeeF to try SPARQL WSDL files with Woden validator, report results.) (Tuesday, 21 March)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 21 March (Monday, 20 March)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 21 Feb (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: [ANNOUNCE] participate in DAWG next steps discussion (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: [ANNOUNCE] participate in DAWG next steps discussion (Tuesday, 14 February)
• trouble with my ACTION (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: changelog ACTION (Wednesday, 8 February)
• changelog ACTION (Wednesday, 8 February)
• regrets (Sunday, 5 February)
• SPARQL Protocol for RDF LC Working Draft Published (Friday, 27 January)
• Re: SHOULD use POST for expensive queries? (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Re: SHOULD use POST for expensive queries? (Wednesday, 18 January)
• SHOULD use POST for expensive queries? (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Re: Technical Plenary f2f meeting plans (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Re: Technical Plenary f2f meeting plans (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Re: Technical Plenary f2f meeting plans (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Re: URI serialization issues (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: all the SPARLQ policy stuff I can find (Sunday, 15 January)
• Re: [Fwd: major technical: no subqueries] (Thursday, 12 January)
• Re: Text about rejecting queries with unacceptable dataset descriptions (Thursday, 12 January)
• protocol draft updated (Wednesday, 11 January)
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused (Wednesday, 11 January)
• why */* in inputSerialization of POST binding? (Wednesday, 11 January)
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused (Wednesday, 11 January)
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused (Wednesday, 11 January)
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused (Wednesday, 11 January)
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused (Tuesday, 10 January)
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused (Tuesday, 10 January)
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused (Tuesday, 10 January)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 10 Jan 14:30Z (Monday, 9 January)
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused (Monday, 9 January)
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused (Monday, 9 January)
• tweaked language for QueryRequestRefused (Friday, 6 January)
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused (Friday, 6 January)
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused (Friday, 6 January)
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused (Friday, 6 January)
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused (Thursday, 5 January)
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused (Thursday, 5 January)
• Query by Reference (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 5 Jan (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Re: comment: QName production in SPARQL grammar; reconsider punctuationSyntax? (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Re: how to subsume or handle warnings? (Tuesday, 3 January)

Lee Feigenbaum

• Re: Review of JSON results format document (Thursday, 30 March)
• Re: run Woden again? (Wednesday, 22 March)
• Re: wsdl fun (re: ACTION: LeeF to try SPARQL WSDL files with Woden validator, report results.) (Tuesday, 21 March)
• wsdl fun (re: ACTION: LeeF to try SPARQL WSDL files with Woden validator, report results.) (Tuesday, 21 March)
• Re: agenda RDF Data Access 14 Mar: suggestions? (Tuesday, 14 March)
• Re: rq23 def'n "Pattern Solution" wrong? (and more on BGP') (Wednesday, 1 March)
• Re: ql wd qa check ok (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: [ANNOUNCE] participate in DAWG next steps discussion (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 14 Feb (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 14 Feb (Tuesday, 14 February)
• rq23 def'n "Pattern Solution" wrong? (and more on BGP') (Tuesday, 14 February)
• minutes, DAWG weekly 7-Feb (Wednesday, 8 February)
• minutes of RDF Data Access 26 Jan (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: CONSTRUCT operator (Wednesday, 25 January)

Libby Miller

• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 28 Mar: in progress (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 21 March: in progress (Monday, 20 March)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 14 Feb (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 24 Jan (Monday, 23 January)
• Re: DAWG 19 Jan cancelled; tune in Tue 24 Jan (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Re: reminder: no DAWG telcon Tue 3 Jan; next telcon is Thu, 5 Jan 11amET/1600UTC (Wednesday, 4 January)

Pat Hayes

• Re: re-opening the DESCRIBE issue (Thursday, 30 March)
• likely regrets (Tuesday, 21 March)
• Re: rq23 def'n "Pattern Solution" wrong? (and more on BGP') (Sunday, 5 March)
• Re: rq23 def'n "Pattern Solution" wrong? (and more on BGP') (Wednesday, 1 March)
• Re: rq23 def'n "Pattern Solution" wrong? (and more on BGP') (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Essay on the basic ideas of RDF graph syntax. (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Tuesday, 31 January)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Tuesday, 31 January)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: Blank nodes and predicates (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: Blank nodes and predicates (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Saturday, 28 January)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Saturday, 28 January)
• Re: Draft response to: Re: major technical: blank nodes (Friday, 27 January)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Friday, 27 January)
• Re: Draft response to: Re: major technical: blank nodes (Friday, 27 January)
• Re: Draft response to: Re: major technical: blank nodes (Friday, 27 January)
• Draft response to: Re: major technical: blank nodes (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: CONSTRUCT operator (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: The theoreticians got rid of the OrderedMerge (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: The theoreticians got rid of the OrderedMerge (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: The theoreticians got rid of the OrderedMerge (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: The theoreticians got rid of the OrderedMerge (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: CONSTRUCT operator (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: olive branch (was: Re: FUB on Pat's proposal for BGP matching (please read)) (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: Email problems? (RE: Editorial thread for BGP matching) (Tuesday, 24 January)
• olive branch (was: Re: FUB on Pat's proposal for BGP matching (please read)) (Tuesday, 24 January)
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching (Monday, 23 January)
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching (Monday, 23 January)
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching (Monday, 23 January)
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching (Monday, 23 January)
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: Wording change (was : Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns) (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: Wording change (was : Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns) (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Wording change (was : Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns) (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Re: SHOULD use POST for expensive queries? (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Tuesday, 17 January)
• http://www.w3.org/2006/01/17-dawg-minutes.html#action05 (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: URI serialization issues (Tuesday, 17 January)
• apology/erratum (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: bnodeification (rdfSemantics) (Friday, 13 January)
• Re: "the graphs referred to in the FROM clauses" [comment: major technical: underspecified errors] (Friday, 13 January)
• Re: bnodeification (Thursday, 12 January)
• Re: bnodeification (Thursday, 12 January)
• Re: bnodeification (Wednesday, 11 January)
• Re: bnodeification (was: Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns) (Tuesday, 10 January)
• Re: bnodeification (was: Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns) (Tuesday, 10 January)
• bnodeification (was: Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns) (Monday, 9 January)
• Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns (Tuesday, 3 January)
• Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns (Monday, 2 January)
• Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns (Monday, 2 January)
• Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns (Monday, 2 January)

Patrick J. Hayes

• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching (Tuesday, 24 January)
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching (Tuesday, 24 January)
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching (Tuesday, 24 January)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: paper on RDF querying relevant to DAWG (and to current discussions) (Wednesday, 29 March)
• [CLOSED] (I guess) Re: [OK?] paper on RDF querying relevant to DAWG (and to current discussions) (Wednesday, 29 March)

Seaborne, Andy

• Re: re-opening the DESCRIBE issue (Thursday, 30 March)
• Re: test suite maintenance: Syntax vs. Query tests (Thursday, 30 March)
• Review of JSON results format document (Thursday, 30 March)
• Re: nameValueForms: ok to postpone? (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Re: Lost in the shuffle? (Re: PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR) (Monday, 27 March)
• Re: ORDER BY allows expression, SELECT does not (Monday, 27 March)
• Tests for LIMIT/OFFSET (Wednesday, 22 March)
• Requirements coverage by test cases (Monday, 20 March)
• Re: testcases (Wednesday, 15 March)
• \u escapes (Friday, 10 March)
• Re: proposed clarifications to the SPARQL grammar (Friday, 10 March)
• [Fwd: SPARQL: arguments for built-in calls to generic?] (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Meeting minutes : 2006-02-21 (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: ql wd qa check ok (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: rq23 def'n "Pattern Solution" wrong? (and more on BGP') (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Monday, 13 February)
• rq23 edits (v1.638) (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Comparing xsd:strings (Monday, 6 February)
• Draft response to: [Fwd: SPARQL Comments (Personal)] (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Monday, 30 January)
• Defn of BGP-equivalence (was: Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5) (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: CONSTRUCT operator (Monday, 30 January)
• Blank nodes and predicates (Monday, 30 January)
• Re: The theoreticians got rid of the OrderedMerge (Thursday, 26 January)
• Editing rq23 for BGP matching (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: The theoreticians got rid of the OrderedMerge (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: The theoreticians got rid of the OrderedMerge (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: The theoreticians got rid of the OrderedMerge (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: FW: Grammar updated to reflect BGP/Constraint interpretation (Tuesday, 24 January)
• Re: http://www.w3.org/2006/01/17-dawg-minutes.html#action05 (Tuesday, 24 January)
• RE: FW: Grammar updated to reflect BGP/Constraint interpretation (Tuesday, 24 January)
• RE: FW: Grammar updated to reflect BGP/Constraint interpretation (Tuesday, 24 January)
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching (Tuesday, 24 January)
• FW: Grammar updated to reflect BGP/Constraint interpretation (Monday, 23 January)
• Re: Editorial thread for BGP matching (Friday, 20 January)
• Editorial thread for BGP matching (Friday, 20 January)
• Additional text for SPARQL matching extensibility (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: Wording change (was : Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns) (Friday, 20 January)
• Re: 7 tests to induct xsd:boolean into SPARQL (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: 7 tests to induct xsd:boolean into SPARQL (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: Intro + question (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Re: SHOULD use POST for expensive queries? (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Re: Technical Plenary f2f meeting plans (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Minutes of the DAWG telecon 2006-Jan-17 (Tuesday, 17 January)
• [Fwd: Incorrect braces in Sparql test cases] (Tuesday, 17 January)
• [Fwd: minor technical on 10.3 Constructing an output graph] (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (rdfSemantics) (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Monday, 16 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Sunday, 15 January)
• Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns (Sunday, 15 January)
• Re: 7 tests to induct xsd:boolean into SPARQL (Friday, 13 January)
• Re: [Fwd: major technical: no subqueries] (Friday, 13 January)
• Re: [Fwd: Major technical comment: identifier length] (Friday, 13 January)
• Re: [Fwd: major technical: no subqueries] (Friday, 13 January)
• Re: 7 tests to induct xsd:boolean into SPARQL (Friday, 13 January)
• RE: protocol draft updated (Thursday, 12 January)
• Text about rejecting queries with unacceptable dataset descriptions (Thursday, 12 January)
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused (Wednesday, 11 January)
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused (Wednesday, 11 January)
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused (Wednesday, 11 January)
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused (Tuesday, 10 January)
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused (Tuesday, 10 January)
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused (Tuesday, 10 January)
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused (Friday, 6 January)
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused (Friday, 6 January)
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused (Friday, 6 January)
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused (Friday, 6 January)
• FW: Suspicious notation in SPARQL lexical rule for STRING_LITERAL_LONG1 [OK?] (Thursday, 5 January)
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused (Thursday, 5 January)
• Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns (Thursday, 5 January)
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused (Thursday, 5 January)
• Re: how to subsume or handle warnings? (Tuesday, 3 January)

Sergio Tessaris

• Re: paper on RDF querying relevant to DAWG (and to current discussions) (Wednesday, 29 March)
• [OK?] paper on RDF querying relevant to DAWG (and to current discussions) (Wednesday, 29 March)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 21 March (Tuesday, 21 March)
• testcases (Tuesday, 14 March)
• Answer to: semantics are poorly specified (Sunday, 29 January)
• CONSTRUCT operator (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: bnodeification (Thursday, 12 January)
• Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns (Sunday, 8 January)
• Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns (Thursday, 5 January)
• Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns (Monday, 2 January)

Souripriya Das

• Re: Draft response to: Re: major technical: blank nodes (Friday, 27 January)
• Re: bnodeification (Thursday, 12 January)
• Re: bnodeification (was: Re: SPARQL semantics: open issues for basic query patterns) (Tuesday, 10 January)

souripriya.das@oracle.com

• ORDER BY allows expression, SELECT does not (Monday, 27 March)
• Protocol document: uri -> iri (Sunday, 26 March)
• Re: PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR (Sunday, 26 March)
• Re: PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR (Saturday, 25 March)
• Re: Meeting minutes: March 14th, 2006 (Monday, 20 March)
• out for next three and half weeks (Monday, 30 January)

Steve Harris

• Re: re-opening the DESCRIBE issue (Thursday, 30 March)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 28 Mar: in progress (Monday, 27 March)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 14 Feb (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Comparing xsd:strings (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: SHOULD use POST for expensive queries? (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Re: [Fwd: Incorrect braces in Sparql test cases] (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 17 Jan (in progress) (Monday, 16 January)
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused (Wednesday, 11 January)
• Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused (Wednesday, 11 January)
• Regrets for Jan 12th and Jan 17th telecons (Monday, 9 January)

Sven Groppe

• RE: [Fwd: rif-ucr published] "Rule Interchange Format Use Cases and Requirements" (Wednesday, 29 March)
• regrets (Monday, 20 March)
• Regrets for telephone conference today (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Regrets for next telephone conference 7th February 2006 (Thursday, 2 February)
• Intro + question (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Intro + question (Wednesday, 18 January)

Sven.Groppe@deri.org

• Minutes telcon 7th February (Wednesday, 8 February)

tessaris

• Minutes of RDF Data Access 31 Jan (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5 (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: CONSTRUCT operator (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: FW: Grammar updated to reflect BGP/Constraint interpretation (Tuesday, 24 January)
• Re: FW: Grammar updated to reflect BGP/Constraint interpretation (Tuesday, 24 January)
• Re: bnodeification (Wednesday, 11 January)

Last message date: Friday, 31 March 2006 06:57:19 UTC