- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 19:16:57 -0600
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 18:13 -0500, Bijan Parsia wrote: > The other nice bit would be if there were nice anchors for the > definitions, e.g, #def1 Do they not already have nice anchors? at least some do: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#defn_RDFTerm http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#defn_QueryVariable And I wonder... why would "definition 15" be better than "Definition: RDF Term"? I agree it's editorial, and if you can work with the editors to get it in, very well. But I don't see that much motivation for it, and it'll take some effort to maintain over time. > I could add both these things in, if that would get these in :) > > Cheers, > Bijan. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 27 March 2006 01:17:05 UTC