- From: Enrico Franconi <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 20:43:21 +0100
- To: andy.seaborne@hp.com
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I propose to have an explicit text to present the reader the alternative semantics by Pat in a simple way, immediately before "As an example of a Basic Graph Pattern:", as follows: "In the case of simple entailment, if the scoping graph G' is such that it does not share blank nodes with BGP, then the above definition can be simplified to use a standard RDF merge instead of an OrderedMerge." I'm sure Andy can find a nicer formulation... --e.
Received on Saturday, 21 January 2006 19:43:35 UTC