- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 10:53:54 -0600
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
hypertext: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/weekly-agenda
plain text:
1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda
+ [1]RDF Data Access WG teleconference 2006-01-05T16:00Z
([2]local times)
o teleconference bridge: [3]+1.617.761.6200 code:7333
+ supplementary IRC chat: [4]#dawg
o [5]log to appear
+ scribe: Jeen Broekstra
+ PROPOSED: to accept [6]DAWG Weekly -- 20 Dec 2005 as a true
record
+ roll call ([7]wg membership). regrets: Libby, Bijan
+ next meeting:
PROPOSED: to meet next 10 Jan. scribe?.
+ Let's continue these without discussion: (none)
+ Let's note these done without discussion:
o ACTION: AndyS to respond re CONSTRUCT *. [8]done
o ACTION: AndyS to Revise rq23 to reflect the decison
(remove told bnode text) Done v 1.598 of [9]QL
editor's draft
o ACTION: Jeen to edit results format per C 'collapsed'
; drop sorting constraint. Done in 2005-12-21 rev of
[10]editor's draft
o ACTION: Lee to review XSLT in results format update.
[11]done
+ Comments on the agenda?
I suspect I have missed some outstanding business, but it's
time to ship this agenda, I think.
2. issues#wsdlAbstractProtocol
+ ACTION: KendallC to propose revised WSDL descripton of
SPARQL protocol
+ ACTION KC: review sparql-types for xs:any weirdness, w.r.t.
WSDL 2.0 constraints
also: [12]query by reference Kendall Clark (Tuesday, 15
November)
3. Toward updated protocol WD (@@and results format WD)
+ ACTION: KendallC to add a modified version of
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#security to
protocol editor's draft, as well as a pointer to the
section in rq23 itself
+ ACTION: KendallC to remove uses of "my" in URIs in protocol
spec
[13]editor's draft shows progress on at least 5 of 14
outstanding comments
4. protocol testing update
+ ACTION: Jeen try to reproduces EliasT's protocol testing
results
+ ACTION: EliasT to recruit somebody to try out the protocol
test harness, perhaps from the -comments list
5. issues#rdfSemantics, issues#owlDisjunction
+ ACTION: Bijan to take a pass through the editor's draft,
listing what will change with the new semantics
understanding, and what will not. in post-meeting chat 20
Dec, Bijan clarified that he considers this discharged by
[14]Enrico's SPARQL Semantics document msg of 24 Oct. I'm
inclined to agree that it's DONE.
+ ACTION PatH: to get Enrico's feedback on PatH's proposal to
stick to the Last Call design. We implicitly withdrew this
last week. In any case, it's... [15]DONE 27 Dec
+ ACTION: Enrico to take a pass through the editor's draft,
listing what will change with the new semantics
understanding. In addition to [16]SPARQL Semantics document
of 24 Oct, we now have [17]specific wording proposals 29
Dec and [18]2 Jan.
I don't see that anyone has responded to this invitation to
complete the QL syntax details of the proposal...
[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
[2] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=1&day=5&year=2006&hour=16&min=0&sec=0&p1=0
[3] tel:+1.617.761.6200
[4] irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
[5] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/05-dawg-irc
[6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/att-0384/20-dawg-minutes.html
[7] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/#who
[8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Dec/0036.html
[9] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/
[10] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/
[11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0392.html
[12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0231.html
[13] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/
[14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0105.html
[15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0390.html
[16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0105.html
[17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0395.html
[18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0000.html
Please, find your favourite way to specify a query with a
non-default entailment (at FUB, by now, we don't have any
favourite way yet). [19]29 Dec
though I note the LC design is unacceptable to FUB:
[19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0395.html
For FUB it is unacceptable to have a standard which does not
provide a hook for entailment.
ibid
6. issues#valueTesting
+ ACTION EricP: add test case for support of xsd:boolean (ala
(?a = ?b) = "true"^^xsd:boolean )
7. Toward CR
+ 31 Jan 2006 charter end date approaches. see also:
[20]toward SPARQL CR, PR, REC, press releases... schedule
review Dan Connolly (Monday, 3 October)
+ [21]lc status (also: lists in editor's drafts)
+ substantive changes... 20 Dec rf1 change (jeen offered to
do a test case). @@link to summary of changes in rq23. no
changes to protocol that are observable on-the-wire, right?
+ Charmod conformance; my [22]OK? message has a forward
reference to protocol LC. Reviewer asks for I18N WG review
in reply
+ The "use XQuery" objection from NI was largely addressed by
a presentation from Melton at XML2005
Dependencies:
+ XQuery WG review ([23]rxd 13Sep)
+ meet requirements of ebXML Registry TC and freebXML
Registry open source implementation? ([24]10 Nov from
Farrukh)
+ charter calls for "architectural review" by [25]Semantic
Web Best Practices and Deployment (SWBPD) Working Group
[26]Wood 26 Sep is relevant, as Wood is a co-chair of SWBPD
WG
+ [27]ietf-types review of application/sparql-results+xml ,
[28]ietf-types review of application/sparql-query
8. test suite maintenance
+ ACTION: AndyS to Make the decimal/double test changes for
later WG approval [29]DONE
+ ACTION: EricP to fix test schema to match manifest with
negative tests [recorded in
[30]09/27-dawg-minutes.html#action16]
+ ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on
op:dateTime triple
+ ACTION DaveB: add to test suite the temperature case from
comment on truth tables in [31]commentor's message
[20] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0003.html
[21] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/lc-status-report.html
[22] http://www.w3.org/mid/1122559086.31751.171.camel@localhost
[23] http://www.w3.org/mid/20050913082804661.00000000668@amalhotr-pc
[24] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0267.html
[25] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/BestPractices/
[26] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Sep/0077.html
[27] http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-types/2005-November/000895.html
[28] http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-types/2005-November/000894.html
[29] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/0335.html
[30] http://www.w3.org/2005/09/27-dawg-minutes.html#action16
[31] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Aug/0030.html
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 4 January 2006 16:54:06 UTC