Re: Comparing xsd:strings

On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 03:55:12PM +0000, Steve Harris wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 03:43:31PM +0000, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> > "11.3 Operator Mapping" does not cover "<" applied to xsd:string, only 
> > simple
> > literals, numerics and xsd:dateTime's  This is despite the fact it is 
> > defined
> > in terms of (F&O) using op:numeric-equal(fn:compare(A, B)...)
> > 
> > If the cases for "<", ">", ">=", "<=" are added for xsd:string/xsd:string 
> > (same defn as the operator on simple literal), then SPARQL covers 
> > comparisons of xsd:strings (and ORDER BY will autmatically pick it up).
> 
> I would be in favour of that.

done now -- forgot the <= and >= before
-- 
-eric

office: +81.466.49.1170 W3C, Keio Research Institute at SFC,
                        Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Keio University,
                        5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-8520
                        JAPAN
        +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA
cell:   +81.90.6533.3882

(eric@w3.org)
Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.