Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 10 Jan 14:30Z

On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 15:03 -0500, Kendall Clark wrote:
> On Jan 9, 2006, at 2:43 PM, Dan Connolly wrote:
> 
> Some updates:
> 
> >     2. issues#wsdlAbstractProtocol
> >           + ACTION: KendallC to propose revised WSDL descripton of
> >             SPARQL protocol
> 
> I think this is (mostly) done in 1.15 (which I just checked in) of
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/sparql-protocol-query.wsdl
> <!-- $Id: sparql-protocol-query.wsdl,v 1.15 2006/01/09 19:59:32  
> kclark Exp $ -->
> 
> I think that's (more or less) how you spell our design in WSDL 2.0,  
> as of the CR drafts.
> 
> But I'd like to have some agenda time to remind myself and everyone  
> else of the design we *want* and have agreed to, particularly with  
> regard to serialization types.

OK.

The rest is all left-over stuff from last Thu that I neglected
to update. Sorry.

> >        also: [8]query by reference Kendall Clark (Tuesday, 15  
> > November)
> 
> This is done. Original commenter accepted our raise-postponement.
> 
> >     3. Toward updated protocol WD (and results format WD)
> >           + ACTION: KendallC to add a modified version of
> >             http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#security to
> >             protocol editor's draft, as well as a pointer to the
> >             section in rq23 itself
> 
> DONE last week.
> 
> >        [9]editor's draft shows progress on at least 5 of 14  
> > outstanding
> >        comments
> 
> More like 10 or 12 of 14, but -shrug-. ;>
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Kendall
> 
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Monday, 9 January 2006 20:10:25 UTC