Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5

On 28 Jan 2006, at 07:08, Pat Hayes wrote:
>> Jos made your example explicit, and he showed that it works :-)
>
> Yes, but my point was that it SHOULDNT have worked. See my reply to  
> Jos.

No, it should obviously work in the old characterisation as well. See  
my reply.
--e.

Received on Saturday, 28 January 2006 13:33:20 UTC