- From: Enrico Franconi <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
- Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 02:45:34 +0200
- To: connolly@w3.org
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
regrets --e. ------- Original message ------- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> Sent: 27/3, 14:48 > > hypetext: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/weekly-agenda > > plain text: > > 1. Convene [1]RDF Data Access WG meeting of 2006-03-28T14:30Z > ([2]local times) > + Comments on the agenda? sorry it's late, again. > + teleconference bridge: [3]tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333 > + scribe: KendallC > o supplementary IRC chat: [4]irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg > ([5]log to appear) > + roll call > + PROPOSED: to ammend [6]Meeting minutes: March 21st, 2006 to > show DanC's action re "underspecified errors" withdrawn and > approve it as ammended > + PROPOSED: to meet again Tue, 4 Apr 2006, 14:30Z (Boston Tue > 10:30 AM; Los Angeles Tue 7:30 AM; London Tue 3:30 PM; > [7]other local times); recruit scribe; confirm chair > 2. comments related to [8]rdfSemantics, [9]owlDisjunction > + ACTION LeeF: to find email thread about wording of > restricting pattern solution domain to variables in BGP; > follow up on that to get text back into rq23 > + ACTION: LeeF to create test case resulting from > 2006-03-03T11:15Z (before lunch, 2nd day) whiteboard > discussion > + ACTION: SergioT to respond to [10]2005-09-18T15:02:48Z > Peter F. Patel-Schneider (overtaken by more recent last > call?) > 3. Issue nameValueForms. PROPOSED: to postpone. > 4. protocol editing, WSDL 2 coordination > + ACTION: KC to update protocol references to [SRD] and WSDL. > done in 1.115, but there are new WSDL drafts now... > + ACTION: LeeF to try SPARQL WSDL files with Woden validator, > report results. [11]done > + ACTION: KendallC to confirm that SPARQL WSDL > query/queryrequest and maxOccurs do not need to be changed, > despite [12]Marsh's comment of 17Feb. Done, I think. > 5. Toward CR > + ACTION: SvenG to follow up with Reto Krummenacher on > [2006-02-24T16:40:55Z Reto Krummenacher]. Note: the thread > is closed as of [13]14 March > + ACTION: DanC to send [OK?] msg to 2006-02-22T23:56:54Z > Peter F. Patel-Schneider on Section 1 and Section 2, > basically, [needstest] [14]done; note reply PFPS, > [15]nearby comment from Enrico > + [16]lc comment status: as of v1.71: 9+1 closed (scripts > missed one), 4-1 pending, and 1 open that is late. note: > [17]status of 1st last call, archived 20 Mar, with 56 > closed, 63 pending, and 21 open (Horrocks, Patel-Schneider, > ter Horst, Patel-Schneider, Baker, Zemke/Oracle) > + ACTION: DanC to draft request for CR progress: [18]CR > request. Done. > PROPOSED: to advance SPARQL to CR as discussed 21 Mar i.e. plan > to go to CR on 29-March-2006, contingent on successful outcomes > of actions in that meeting. See [19]ballot results > 6. JSON results format > + ACTION: Elias When finialized, email the WG for review as > possible WG Note. [20]done. Review offered by: AndyS, > Sergio, Steve > 7. test suite maintenance > + ACTION: EricP to work on [2006-02-24T08:45:23Z Olivier > [ Corby], potentially automating examples2tests [21]progress, > [22]done. anybody able to reproduce EricP's work? > + ACTION: AndyS conjure some LIMIT/OFFSET tests. [23]progress > 22March > + ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on > op:dateTime triple > See also [24]comment threads marked [test-todo] and [25]REQUEST > FOR TESTCASE in WG threads > 8. MIME type registrations > + ACTION EricP: to follow up on mime type requests ([26]2Mar) > 9. UC&R end-game. > We didn't do a last call review, so it's not in order to request > CR for it. Let's make it a NOTE, shall we? > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ > [2] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=03&day=28&year=2006&hour=14&min=30&sec=0&p1=0 > [3] tel:+1.617.761.6200 > [4] irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg > [5] http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-dawg-irc > [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0465.html > [7] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=4&day=4&year=2006&hour=14&min=30&sec=0&p1=0 > [8] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#rdfSemantics > [9] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#owlDisjunction > [10] http://www.w3.org/mid/20050918.110248.43269866.pfps@research.bell-labs.com > [11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0475.html > [12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Feb/0009.html > [13] http://www.w3.org/mid/4416F59B.4090307@deri.org > [14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Mar/0053.html > [15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Mar/0062.html > [16] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/lc-status-report.html > [17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2006Mar/att-0022/lc-status-report.html__charset_us-ascii > [18] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/crq349 > [19] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/crq349/results > [20] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0477.html > [21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0452.html > [22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0476.html > [23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0472.html > [24] http://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Public/search?type-index=public-rdf-dawg-comments&index-type=t&keywords=test-todo&search=Search > [25] http://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Public/search?keywords=request+for+testcase&hdr-1-name=subject&hdr-1-query=&index-grp=Public__FULL&index-type=t&type-i ndex=public-rdf-dawg > [26] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf6#pubIssues > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E > >
Received on Tuesday, 28 March 2006 00:46:30 UTC