- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 19:26:30 -0600
- To: "souripriya.das@oracle.com" <souripriya.das@oracle.com>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 19:54 -0500, souripriya.das@oracle.com wrote: > This has been raised by people and acknowledged in > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Jan/0075.html. > I was wondering what the reasoning was behind this. I don't think the asymmetry is a conscious design choice. As I recall, SELECT was designed early on, and ORDER BY came later. We don't have any requirements for expressions in select, and aside from the occasional thinking-out-loud here or there, none of the WG discussions have argued for a change, so it hasn't been changed. > Thanks, > - Souri. > > > -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 27 March 2006 01:26:34 UTC