- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 16:06:31 -0600
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
In reviewing our request for CR, http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/crq349 there was a lot of concern about interoperability around DESCRIBE. TimBL took a close look at CBD and MSG from http://semanticweb.deit.univpm.it/submissions/www2005/WWW2005_signignRDF.pdf and looked briefly at GK's recent proposal http://www.w3.org/mid/4427D376.9070504@ninebynine.org and concluded that this issue merits considerable further work. We talked about the possibility of postponing the issue and marking the DESCRIBE syntax "reserved for future use" and he was supportive of that. The issue is hereby re-opened. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#DESCRIBE I look forward to proposals to close/postpone it. I gather Andy is available to discuss them only thru this Friday. There's still a reasonably good chance that we can get a SPARQL CR out next week, if we come to consensus on something quickly. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 29 March 2006 22:06:35 UTC