- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 14:20:34 +0100
- To: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- CC: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Kendall Clark wrote: > > On Mar 27, 2006, at 2:49 PM, Dan Connolly wrote: > >> There have been some discussion of how SPARQL interacts >> with the ?name=value HTML form syntax/protocol. (I see a discussion mainly about RDF forms) SPARQLer uses HTMLs forms with action being the service and the method being GET. I hope it's a correct translation of WSDL to HTTP/GET - it's not done mechanically. >> I think >> it's an interesting design space to noodle on; it came >> up in a public comment and I bumped into it enough times >> that I was convinced to add a WG issue. >> >> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#nameValueForms >> >> I have chatted with a few of you about it; everybody >> (including the original commentor) is OK to postpone it. >> >> Does anybody 2nd this proposal to postpone it? > > Seconded. (FWIW, I probably would have voted against including it on > our issues list, but apparently that's at the chair's discretion.) Agreed - postpone (my pref would be "not-an-issue" but if it helps the record, postpone is acceptable). > > Cheers, > Kendall > Andy
Received on Tuesday, 28 March 2006 13:20:50 UTC