- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
- Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:09:50 -0500
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I was just trying to explain some stuff about sparql to some folks, and I realized, again, the pain it is not to have numbers on the definitions (so I can say things like Definition 1). I believe I've mentioned this before, but, eh, so many months, so much email, so many phone calls.... Is it possible to slip this (minor, editorial) change in? No big, but I think it could make life a touch easier. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Sunday, 26 March 2006 23:09:47 UTC