- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 17:53:55 +0000
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, swh@ecs.soton.ac.uk, "'RDF Data Access Working Group'" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Dan Connolly wrote: > On Jan 17, 2006, at 5:58 PM, Pat Hayes wrote: >>> [NEW] ACTION: DanC to review test README re "logically equivalent" vs >>> graph equivalent [recorded in >>> http://www.w3.org/2006/01/17-dawg-minutes.html#action05] >> I took over this action from Dan. > > for which, thanks. > >> Change suggested to >> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/README.html : >> >> " A test passes if the graph from the action is logically equivalent >> to the graph named in the result. "Logical equivalence " can be tested >> by eliminating redundant bNodes in both graphs and testing if the >> graphs are isomorphic: same shape, same labels." >> // >> " A test passes if the graph from the action is <a >> href="http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#section-graph- >> equality">equivalent</a>[RDF-CONCEPTS] to the graph named in the >> result. Equivalence can be tested by checking that the graphs are >> isomorphic and have identical IRI and literal nodes." > > Looks good to me. > >> <<I deleted 'same labels' as it might imply a need for the same >> bnodeIDs to be used.>> >> >> Other typos I noticed: >> >> Open parenthesis (earlier in above paragraph) with no matching close. >> superceeded /superceded >> RDf/RDF >> specificed/specified >> achives/achieves >> Changes made (text swapped, typos changed) for action: ACTION AndyS: implement test README change from http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0145.html from telecon 24/Jan/06 Andy
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2006 18:07:13 UTC