- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:47:37 -0600
- To: Libby Miller <libby@asemantics.com>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
hypertext: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/weekly-agenda
plain text:
1. Convene [1]RDF Data Access WG meeting of 2006-03-21T14:30Z
([2]local times)
+ Comments on the agenda: I'm caught up as far as finding all
the relevant actions; I have found some of the relevant
progress reports, but I think there may be more.
Sorry it's late again. And sorry I flaked last week. I have
been busy [3]travelling: [4]tech plenary, [5]SXSWi in
Austin, [6]security workshop in NY
+ teleconference bridge: [7]tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333
+ scribe: JanneS
o supplementary IRC chat: [8]irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
([9]log to appear)
+ roll call. regrets: Libby Miller, Sven Groppe
+ PROPOSED: to ammend [10]Meeting minutes: March 14th, 2006
to show Elias Torres present and correct the spelling of
Souripriya Das, and to approve it, as ammended, as a true
record
+ PROPOSED: to meet again 27 March, 1400Z; recruit scribe;
confirm chair
+ Let's note these done without discussion:
o ACTION: EricP to email the semweb CG about a
sparql-dev mailing list. Done; see [11]new mailing
list from DanC 9 Mar
o ACTION: AndyS to change "this is" to "RDF graphs are"
in response to both [2006-02-22T20:32:56Z Peter F.
Patel-Schneider] and [2006-02-22T23:56:54Z Peter F.
Patel-Schneider]
o There's an editing action implicit in the decision
from last week; it seems to be done in the
[12]editor's draft v1.663 of 2006/03/16 17:04:47
2. comments related to [13]rdfSemantics, [14]owlDisjunction
+ ACTION: Enrico to explain definitions in reply to LeeF's
questions (done, yes?)
+ ACTION LeeF: to find email thread about wording of
restricting pattern solution domain to variables in BGP;
follow up on that to get text back into rq23
+ ACTION: SergioT to ask Ian Horrocks if he is satisfied with
DAWG resolution of owlDisjunction
+ ACTION: LeeF to create test case resulting from
2006-03-03T11:15Z (before lunch, 2nd day) whiteboard
discussion
+ ACTION: SergioT to respond to [2005-09-18T15:02:48Z Peter
F. Patel-Schneider]
+ ACTION: SerT to make test case for bnode scope in different
BGPs [15]progress
3. Toward CR: protocol editing, etc.
+ ACTION: KC to update protocol references to [SRD] and WSDL
+ ACTION: KendallC to edit proto-wd w.r.t. decision: in case
of syntax error [including extension], must return
malformed query or query request refused
+ ACTION: KC to work on edited changelog since 2005-09-14
LCWD; in progress... done?
+ ACTION: LeeF to try SPARQL WSDL files with Woden validator,
report results.
4. Toward CR: exit criteria
+ ACTION: SteveH and AndyS to map approved tests to UC&R
features [16]progress; done?
+ ACTION: DanC to noodle on SOAP exit criteria
5. Toward CR, comments, misc
+ ACTION: DanC to respond to [17]major technical:
underspecified errors
+ ACTION: DanC to join the [2005-09-08T01:26:59Z Peter F.
Patel-Schneider] thread with PPS's late Feb comments
+ ACTION: DanC to fix the "inconsistent use of terminology"
[2005-09-23T14:34:50Z Peter F. Patel-Schneider] thread
+ ACTION: AndyS to respond to [2006-02-22T14:46:35Z Arjohn
Kampman]
+ ACTION: EricP to respond to [2006-02-23T09:38:05Z Arjohn
Kampman]
+ ACTION: AndyS to respond to [2006-02-24T08:45:23Z Olivier
Corby]
+ ACTION: EricP to work on [2006-02-24T08:45:23Z Olivier
[ Corby], potentially automating examples2tests [18]progress
+ ACTION: SvenG to follow up with Reto Krummenacher on
[2006-02-24T16:40:55Z Reto Krummenacher]
+ [19]lc comment status: as of v1.58: 50 closed, 60 pending,
and 18 open (6 re rdfSemantics, 11 from Oracle, 1 from
Baker)
o Charmod conformance; my [20]OK? message has a forward
reference to protocol LC. Reviewer asks for I18N WG
review in reply
+ ACTION: DanC to draft request for CR progress: [21]CR
request, in progress
6. MIME type registrations
+ ACTION EricP: to follow up on mime type requests ([22]2Mar)
7. test suite maintenance
+ ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on
op:dateTime triple
+ ACTION: Jeen to figure out whether he can become test case
editor and report back by telecon on Mar 14
See also [23]comment threads marked [test-todo] and [24]REQUEST
FOR TESTCASE in WG threads
8. JSON results format
+ ACTION: Elias When finialized, email the WG for review as
possible WG Note. Review offered by: AndyS, Sergio, Steve
[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
[2] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=03&day=21&year=2006&hour=14&min=30&sec=0&p1=0
[3] http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/#travl
[4] http://dig.csail.mit.edu/breadcrumbs/node/92
[5] http://dig.csail.mit.edu/breadcrumbs/node/93
[6] http://dig.csail.mit.edu/breadcrumbs/node/97
[7] tel:+1.617.761.6200
[8] irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
[9] http://www.w3.org/2006/03/21-dawg-irc
[10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0448.html
[11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0436.html
[12] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/
[13] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#rdfSemantics
[14] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#owlDisjunction
[15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0446.html
[16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0455.html
[17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Jan/0066.html
[18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0452.html
[19] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/lc-status-report.html
[20] http://www.w3.org/mid/1122559086.31751.171.camel@localhost
[21] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/crq349
[22] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf6#pubIssues
[23] http://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Public/search?type-index=public-rdf-dawg-comments&index-type=t&keywords=test-todo&search=Search
[24] http://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Public/search?keywords=request+for+testcase&hdr-1-name=subject&hdr-1-query=&index-grp=Public__FULL&index-type=t&type-index=public-rdf-dawg
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 20 March 2006 21:47:44 UTC