- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:47:37 -0600
- To: Libby Miller <libby@asemantics.com>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
hypertext: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/weekly-agenda plain text: 1. Convene [1]RDF Data Access WG meeting of 2006-03-21T14:30Z ([2]local times) + Comments on the agenda: I'm caught up as far as finding all the relevant actions; I have found some of the relevant progress reports, but I think there may be more. Sorry it's late again. And sorry I flaked last week. I have been busy [3]travelling: [4]tech plenary, [5]SXSWi in Austin, [6]security workshop in NY + teleconference bridge: [7]tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333 + scribe: JanneS o supplementary IRC chat: [8]irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg ([9]log to appear) + roll call. regrets: Libby Miller, Sven Groppe + PROPOSED: to ammend [10]Meeting minutes: March 14th, 2006 to show Elias Torres present and correct the spelling of Souripriya Das, and to approve it, as ammended, as a true record + PROPOSED: to meet again 27 March, 1400Z; recruit scribe; confirm chair + Let's note these done without discussion: o ACTION: EricP to email the semweb CG about a sparql-dev mailing list. Done; see [11]new mailing list from DanC 9 Mar o ACTION: AndyS to change "this is" to "RDF graphs are" in response to both [2006-02-22T20:32:56Z Peter F. Patel-Schneider] and [2006-02-22T23:56:54Z Peter F. Patel-Schneider] o There's an editing action implicit in the decision from last week; it seems to be done in the [12]editor's draft v1.663 of 2006/03/16 17:04:47 2. comments related to [13]rdfSemantics, [14]owlDisjunction + ACTION: Enrico to explain definitions in reply to LeeF's questions (done, yes?) + ACTION LeeF: to find email thread about wording of restricting pattern solution domain to variables in BGP; follow up on that to get text back into rq23 + ACTION: SergioT to ask Ian Horrocks if he is satisfied with DAWG resolution of owlDisjunction + ACTION: LeeF to create test case resulting from 2006-03-03T11:15Z (before lunch, 2nd day) whiteboard discussion + ACTION: SergioT to respond to [2005-09-18T15:02:48Z Peter F. Patel-Schneider] + ACTION: SerT to make test case for bnode scope in different BGPs [15]progress 3. Toward CR: protocol editing, etc. + ACTION: KC to update protocol references to [SRD] and WSDL + ACTION: KendallC to edit proto-wd w.r.t. decision: in case of syntax error [including extension], must return malformed query or query request refused + ACTION: KC to work on edited changelog since 2005-09-14 LCWD; in progress... done? + ACTION: LeeF to try SPARQL WSDL files with Woden validator, report results. 4. Toward CR: exit criteria + ACTION: SteveH and AndyS to map approved tests to UC&R features [16]progress; done? + ACTION: DanC to noodle on SOAP exit criteria 5. Toward CR, comments, misc + ACTION: DanC to respond to [17]major technical: underspecified errors + ACTION: DanC to join the [2005-09-08T01:26:59Z Peter F. Patel-Schneider] thread with PPS's late Feb comments + ACTION: DanC to fix the "inconsistent use of terminology" [2005-09-23T14:34:50Z Peter F. Patel-Schneider] thread + ACTION: AndyS to respond to [2006-02-22T14:46:35Z Arjohn Kampman] + ACTION: EricP to respond to [2006-02-23T09:38:05Z Arjohn Kampman] + ACTION: AndyS to respond to [2006-02-24T08:45:23Z Olivier Corby] + ACTION: EricP to work on [2006-02-24T08:45:23Z Olivier [ Corby], potentially automating examples2tests [18]progress + ACTION: SvenG to follow up with Reto Krummenacher on [2006-02-24T16:40:55Z Reto Krummenacher] + [19]lc comment status: as of v1.58: 50 closed, 60 pending, and 18 open (6 re rdfSemantics, 11 from Oracle, 1 from Baker) o Charmod conformance; my [20]OK? message has a forward reference to protocol LC. Reviewer asks for I18N WG review in reply + ACTION: DanC to draft request for CR progress: [21]CR request, in progress 6. MIME type registrations + ACTION EricP: to follow up on mime type requests ([22]2Mar) 7. test suite maintenance + ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on op:dateTime triple + ACTION: Jeen to figure out whether he can become test case editor and report back by telecon on Mar 14 See also [23]comment threads marked [test-todo] and [24]REQUEST FOR TESTCASE in WG threads 8. JSON results format + ACTION: Elias When finialized, email the WG for review as possible WG Note. Review offered by: AndyS, Sergio, Steve [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ [2] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=03&day=21&year=2006&hour=14&min=30&sec=0&p1=0 [3] http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/#travl [4] http://dig.csail.mit.edu/breadcrumbs/node/92 [5] http://dig.csail.mit.edu/breadcrumbs/node/93 [6] http://dig.csail.mit.edu/breadcrumbs/node/97 [7] tel:+1.617.761.6200 [8] irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg [9] http://www.w3.org/2006/03/21-dawg-irc [10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0448.html [11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0436.html [12] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/ [13] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#rdfSemantics [14] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#owlDisjunction [15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0446.html [16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0455.html [17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Jan/0066.html [18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0452.html [19] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/lc-status-report.html [20] http://www.w3.org/mid/1122559086.31751.171.camel@localhost [21] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/crq349 [22] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf6#pubIssues [23] http://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Public/search?type-index=public-rdf-dawg-comments&index-type=t&keywords=test-todo&search=Search [24] http://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Public/search?keywords=request+for+testcase&hdr-1-name=subject&hdr-1-query=&index-grp=Public__FULL&index-type=t&type-index=public-rdf-dawg -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 20 March 2006 21:47:44 UTC