- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:34:03 -0500
- To: dawg mailing list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Folks, I'm having trouble with my action to add a SPARQL++ query to the protocol doc and to think about whether that sparks any mojo re: a separate interface. EricP did his part and supplied some interesting queries, but I haven't added them to the editor's draft yet because I don't know what the response should be. And I can't see much utility in merely copying his queries (alone) into the editor's draft w/out some idea of what I think the response should be. I think the default view (as I understand it) is now my preferred design option: if you want to handle SPARQL++ queries, that's great, but do so in a separate interface. The editor's draft says as much already, so I'm happy to leave it as-is. I don't know if this discharges my ACTION, but it's the state of play as of today. Cheers, Kendall
Received on Monday, 13 February 2006 19:34:24 UTC