trouble with my ACTION

• From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
• Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:34:03 -0500
• To: dawg mailing list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
• Message-Id: <7A3899AF-D0E9-4EDF-A859-6450C9AAC7CE@monkeyfist.com>

Folks,

I'm having trouble with my action to add a SPARQL++ query to the  
protocol doc and to think about whether that sparks any mojo re: a  
separate interface.

EricP did his part and supplied some interesting queries, but I  
haven't added them to the editor's draft yet because I don't know  
what the response should be. And I can't see much utility in merely  
copying his queries (alone) into the editor's draft w/out some idea  
of what I think the response should be.

I think the default view (as I understand it) is now my preferred  
design option: if you want to handle SPARQL++ queries, that's great,  
but do so in a separate interface. The editor's draft says as much  
already, so I'm happy to leave it as-is.

I don't know if this discharges my ACTION, but it's the state of play  
as of today.

Cheers,
Kendall

Received on Monday, 13 February 2006 19:34:24 UTC