RE: protocol draft updated

-------- Original Message --------
> From: Kendall Clark <>
> Date: 11 January 2006 20:50
> 
> Folks,
> 
> Please find
> 
> $Revision: 1.90 $ of $Date: 2006/01/11 20:45:11 $.
> 
> of <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/>.
> 
> 1.90 is close to being a LC candidate. Still left to complete or
> integrate:
> 
> 1. fix the kanji example results (I've asked for EricP's help with
this)
> 2. integrate policy changes from Team once they send them to me
> 3. finish working through Karl Dubost's Q&A requests
> 
> (Though note that re: (3), the biggie was the lack of conformance
> language, about which more below)
> 
> Notable changes since 1.89:
> 
> - added a conformance section (4. Conformance) (per Q&A review)
> - conformance section includes statement of which parts of the doc
> are normative or informative
> - added a bit about who might be interested in this spec (per Q&A
> review)
> - changed excerpt formatting a bit for legibility
> - synched language with WSDL changes (mostly this involves changes to
> the HTTP bindings section)
> - tightened the distinction between SPARQL Protocol (the wsdl, xsd,
> and for-humans spec) and SPARQL Protocol for RDF (the for-humans spec)
> - changed the language of QueryRequestRefused: must is now should and
> there's an explicit statement that HTTP status codes and headers can
> be returned irrespective of the two WSDL faults defined by SPARQL
> Protocol

The new text is much clearer.  Thank you.

	Andy

> - changed fault-details should be returned to must be returned to
> help distinguish in the 400 and 500 cases between HTTP status codes
> and WSDL faults
> - added an informative note about serialization constraints
> - added 2.2.1.12 SELECT with internationalization (incomplete)
> - added 2.2.1.13 SELECT with queryHttpPost between and XML input
> - changed old SOAP namespace in the SOAP example
> 
> Cheers,
> Kendall

Received on Thursday, 12 January 2006 15:45:36 UTC