- From: <souripriya.das@oracle.com>
- Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 14:45:11 -0500
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: eric@w3.org, RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4426EF47.2080102@oracle.com>
Dan, Thanks for clarifying the process, specifically that old issues cannot be re-argued once we enter CR. I am trying hard to get it to a stage where I can vote YES for the transition. But, I do need to first get an okay from folks in my organization. In the mean time, I have prepared the attached write-up for use in communicating with Fred Zemke regarding his comments that have so far not been responded to specifically, 4 major technical comments and 6 minor technical comments. Also, I did not see any response to his editorial comments. Regarding blank nodes, although already answered, I thought Pat Hayes' draft response for that was written very well and can be communicated to him. Btw, is it okay for non-DAWG members to see e-mails exchanged inside DAWG? I know those are public, but ... Thanks, - Souri. Dan Connolly wrote: >On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 10:33 -0500, souripriya.das@oracle.com wrote: > > >>Two things: >> >>1) I need more time to discuss this within Oracle. >> >> > >How much more time? > > > >>2) I need a confirmation of my following understanding of the process: >>A "YES" vote from me at this point for transition to CR does not >>prevent Oracle from raising new issues or pursuing further any of the >>issues that have been raised earlier by Oracle folks even after the >>SPARQL documents move to the CR phase. Thus, for example, if Fred >>Zemke wants to pursue some of his earlier comments further, even after >>SPARQL documents move to CR with my "YES" vote, he will be allowed to >>do that (that is, he will not be prevented from doing that based on >>any technicalities of the W3C process). >> >> > >If Oracle finds _new_ information after we enter CR, then the >WG is obliged to consider it. > >But Fred's earlier comments will not be new information with respect >to the CR decision we're making this week. Once we have made >this decision (assuming we do make it), it will not be in order >to go back over them without new information. > >So we need to know if they've been handled to your satisfaction. > > > >>>Please indicate your support (or otherwise) via this form: >>> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/crq349/ >>> >>> > > >
Attachments
- text/html attachment: fz_3.htm
Received on Sunday, 26 March 2006 19:45:27 UTC