- From: Enrico Franconi <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 00:28:42 +0100
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>, RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 18 Jan 2006, at 00:14, Pat Hayes wrote: > Well, I'll go along with the tide as far as I can, but the more I > think about this, the better the 'allow redundancy but deprecate > it' solution seems to be. I think we are on track to do a premature > optimization thingie here which will quite soon turn out to have > been just the kind of mistake we ought to have learned not to make. > But I'm not going to lie down in the road about it, to use a phrase > I recently learned from Bijan. My main concern is that you would loose equivalence with subgraph matching. But see my previous email <http://www.w3.org/mid/ 0BA83124-9557-4567-A3D0-E73504613968@inf.unibz.it> where I try to argue (while agreeing) with your arguments. --e.
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2006 23:29:02 UTC