- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:49:57 -0500
- To: dawg mailing list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Folks, Please find $Revision: 1.90 $ of $Date: 2006/01/11 20:45:11 $. of <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/>. 1.90 is close to being a LC candidate. Still left to complete or integrate: 1. fix the kanji example results (I've asked for EricP's help with this) 2. integrate policy changes from Team once they send them to me 3. finish working through Karl Dubost's Q&A requests (Though note that re: (3), the biggie was the lack of conformance language, about which more below) Notable changes since 1.89: - added a conformance section (4. Conformance) (per Q&A review) - conformance section includes statement of which parts of the doc are normative or informative - added a bit about who might be interested in this spec (per Q&A review) - changed excerpt formatting a bit for legibility - synched language with WSDL changes (mostly this involves changes to the HTTP bindings section) - tightened the distinction between SPARQL Protocol (the wsdl, xsd, and for-humans spec) and SPARQL Protocol for RDF (the for-humans spec) - changed the language of QueryRequestRefused: must is now should and there's an explicit statement that HTTP status codes and headers can be returned irrespective of the two WSDL faults defined by SPARQL Protocol - changed fault-details should be returned to must be returned to help distinguish in the 400 and 500 cases between HTTP status codes and WSDL faults - added an informative note about serialization constraints - added 2.2.1.12 SELECT with internationalization (incomplete) - added 2.2.1.13 SELECT with queryHttpPost between and XML input - changed old SOAP namespace in the SOAP example Cheers, Kendall
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2006 20:50:06 UTC