Re: Editorial changes in Section 2.5

tessaris wrote:
...
> 
> BTW Andy: T_i shouldn't have any bnode in common with bnodes used in
> SM(QS) too; otherwise, unwanted co-references might appear in the
> resulting graph (this, regadless the BGP/BGP' business).
> 
> --sergio
> 
Done

	Andy

Received on Thursday, 2 February 2006 10:15:51 UTC