Adam Barth
Adrien de Croy
- Re: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis (Sunday, 12 March)
- Re: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis (Sunday, 12 March)
- Re: HTTP/QUIC Diverging from HTTP/2 (Friday, 10 March)
- Re: HTTP/QUIC Diverging from HTTP/2 (Friday, 10 March)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Sunday, 5 March)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? (Tuesday, 14 February)
- The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? (Tuesday, 14 February)
Alcides Viamontes E
Alex Rousskov
- Re: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis (Friday, 10 March)
- Re: forward HTTPS proxy | Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Thursday, 2 March)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: Why should caches and intermediaries ignore If-Match? (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: Why should caches and intermediaries ignore If-Match? (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: Why should caches and intermediaries ignore If-Match? (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt (Monday, 6 February)
Amos Jeffries
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Sunday, 19 March)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-08, "6.1. Normative References" (Wednesday, 15 March)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-immutable-01.txt (Wednesday, 15 March)
- Re: Appropriate use of HTTP status codes for application health checks (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: Appropriate use of HTTP status codes for application health checks (Thursday, 23 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case? (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: NEW PREFERENCE - depth-noroot (request for expert review) (Thursday, 12 January)
Andy Green
Ashok Kumar
Barry Leiba
Ben Campbell
Benedikt Christoph Wolters
chaals@yandex-team.ru
Chris Bentzel
Cory Benfield
- Re: Position of HPACK Dynamic Table Size Update (Thursday, 30 March)
- Re: HTTP/QUIC Diverging from HTTP/2 (Friday, 10 March)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? (Wednesday, 15 February)
- HTTP/2 plaintext upgrade (Thursday, 26 January)
- Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case? (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Clarify some handling about extension frame and unknown frame on HTTP/2 (Saturday, 21 January)
- Re: Proposed text for erratum on PRIORITY in RFC 7540 (Friday, 20 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames (Wednesday, 18 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames (Wednesday, 18 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames (Tuesday, 17 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames (Tuesday, 17 January)
Craig Pratt
Cyrus Daboo
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Sunday, 19 March)
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Saturday, 18 March)
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Wednesday, 8 March)
Daniel Stenberg
Daniel Veditz
Daurnimator
Dave Dolson
Emily Stark
Eric Rescorla
Francesco Chemolli
Frederik Deweerdt
Gabriel Montenegro
geronimotita@gmail.com
Hartford, Eric
Ilari Liusvaara
Ilya Grigorik
internet-drafts@ietf.org
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-early-hints-01.txt (Wednesday, 29 March)
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-11.txt (Friday, 17 March)
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-immutable-01.txt (Monday, 13 March)
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rand-access-live-00.txt (Wednesday, 8 March)
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-08.txt (Friday, 3 March)
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-05.txt (Thursday, 2 March)
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-07.txt (Tuesday, 14 February)
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-origin-frame-02.txt (Monday, 13 February)
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-expect-ct-00.txt (Wednesday, 8 February)
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-early-hints-00.txt (Wednesday, 8 February)
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10.txt (Wednesday, 1 February)
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-immutable-00.txt (Thursday, 12 January)
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-04.txt (Monday, 9 January)
Jacob Champion
James M Snell
Jason T. Greene
Jim Reid
Joe Touch
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Monday, 27 March)
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Monday, 20 March)
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Sunday, 19 March)
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Sunday, 19 March)
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Sunday, 19 March)
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Sunday, 19 March)
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Sunday, 19 March)
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Sunday, 19 March)
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Saturday, 18 March)
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Saturday, 18 March)
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Saturday, 18 March)
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Tuesday, 7 March)
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Tuesday, 7 March)
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Tuesday, 7 March)
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Tuesday, 7 March)
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Tuesday, 7 March)
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Tuesday, 7 March)
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Monday, 6 March)
jouni.nospam
Julian Reschke
- Reminder: HTTPbis WG meeting Friday, March 31, 14:00 UTC (Thursday, 30 March)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-08, Relaxing UTF-8 requirement for `keyid` (Wednesday, 29 March)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-08, "6.1. Normative References" (Wednesday, 15 March)
- draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-08, "6.1. Normative References" (Saturday, 11 March)
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-08.txt (Tuesday, 7 March)
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-05.txt (Thursday, 2 March)
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-04 (Thursday, 23 February)
- Re: Partial review of draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-04 (Tuesday, 21 February)
- draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-07, "2. The “aes128gcm” HTTP Content Coding" (Monday, 20 February)
- Re: status of rfc6265bis? (Monday, 13 February)
- status of rfc6265bis? (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: aes128gcm: is the 1st example wrong? (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: aes128gcm: is the 1st example wrong? (Sunday, 12 February)
- Re: Issue 271 of 5987bis - Proposed Standard or Internet Standard? (Tuesday, 31 January)
- Re: Issue 271 of 5987bis - Proposed Standard or Internet Standard? (Monday, 16 January)
- Re: Issue 271 of 5987bis - Proposed Standard or Internet Standard? (Friday, 13 January)
- Re: NEW PREFERENCE - depth-noroot (request for expert review) (Thursday, 12 January)
- UPDATE TO PREFERENCE - return=representation (request for expert review) (Thursday, 12 January)
- NEW PREFERENCE - depth-noroot (request for expert review) (Thursday, 12 January)
- Re: Question regarding RFC 7230 (Sunday, 8 January)
- Re: Question regarding RFC 7230 (Saturday, 7 January)
Kari Hurtta
- Re: forward HTTPS proxy | Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Friday, 3 March)
- Re: forward HTTPS proxy | Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Thursday, 2 March)
- Re: forward HTTPS proxy | Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Thursday, 2 March)
- forward HTTPS proxy | Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Wednesday, 1 March)
- UI | Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Wednesday, 1 March)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Wednesday, 15 February)
- draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10 (Monday, 6 February)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10: 2.3. The "http-opportunistic" well-known URI / cache-control (Sunday, 5 February)
- draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10: 2.3. The "http-opportunistic" well-known URI / cache-control (Saturday, 4 February)
- draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10: Example 2.1. Alternative Server Opt-In (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: Multiple Alt-Svc parameters of the same type (Monday, 16 January)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption (was wrong draft) | Re: (rephrasing, sorry for duplicate) | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding (Thursday, 12 January)
- draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption (was wrong draft) | Re: (rephrasing, sorry for duplicate) | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding (Wednesday, 11 January)
- Re: (rephrasing, sorry for duplicate) | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding (Tuesday, 10 January)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding (Friday, 6 January)
- Re: (rephrasing, sorry for duplicate) | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding (Tuesday, 3 January)
Karl Dubost
Kazuho Oku
- Re: 103 (Early Hints) vs. response headers (Wednesday, 29 March)
- Re: 103 (Early Hints) vs. response headers (Saturday, 18 March)
- Re: 103 (Early Hints) vs. response headers (Thursday, 16 March)
- Re: 103 (Early Hints) vs. response headers (Thursday, 16 March)
- Re: 103 (Early Hints) vs. response headers (Wednesday, 15 March)
- Re: 103 (Early Hints) vs. response headers (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: 103 (Early Hints) vs. response headers (Friday, 24 February)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-early-hints-00.txt (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: Call for Adoption: Early Hints (103) (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: HTTP/2 plaintext upgrade (Friday, 27 January)
- Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case? (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case? (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames (Thursday, 19 January)
Kit Cambridge
laike9m
Loïc Hoguin
Lucas Pardue
Manger, James
- RE: aes128gcm: is the 1st example wrong? (Thursday, 16 February)
- RE: aes128gcm: is the 1st example wrong? (Sunday, 12 February)
- RE: Change to padding in encryption -- examples look ok (Tuesday, 31 January)
- RE: Change to padding in encryption -- enabling random access (Monday, 30 January)
- RE: Change to padding in encryption -- enabling random access (Monday, 30 January)
- RE: aes128gcm: why verify padding? (Monday, 30 January)
- RE: aes128gcm: why verify padding? (Monday, 30 January)
- RE: aes128gcm: why verify padding? (Friday, 27 January)
- RE: aes128gcm: why verify padding? (Tuesday, 24 January)
- RE: aes128gcm: why verify padding? (Monday, 23 January)
- RE: aes128gcm: why verify padding? (Monday, 23 January)
- aes128gcm: vulnerable to truncation attacks (Monday, 23 January)
- aes128gcm: is the 1st example wrong? (Tuesday, 17 January)
- RE: aes128gcm: why verify padding? (Monday, 16 January)
- aes128gcm: why verify padding? (Sunday, 15 January)
Mark Nottingham
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Monday, 20 March)
- Re: 103 (Early Hints) vs. response headers (Friday, 17 March)
- FYI: Browser caching tests (Thursday, 16 March)
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Tuesday, 7 March)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7232 (4957) (Tuesday, 7 March)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7232 (4957) (Monday, 6 March)
- Re: Why should caches and intermediaries ignore If-Match? (Friday, 3 March)
- Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-08.txt (Friday, 3 March)
- Re: Secdir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10 (Thursday, 2 March)
- DRAFT agenda for Chicago (Wednesday, 1 March)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10 (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: Why should caches and intermediaries ignore If-Match? (Sunday, 26 February)
- Re: Appropriate use of HTTP status codes for application health checks (Sunday, 26 February)
- Re: 103 (Early Hints) vs. response headers (Friday, 24 February)
- Third Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: status of rfc6265bis? (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: T-E chunked trailers (Friday, 10 February)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4925) (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: Call for Adoption: Early Hints (103) (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes (Saturday, 4 February)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt (Friday, 3 February)
- Re: Call for Adoption: Expect-CT (Friday, 3 February)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt (Friday, 3 February)
- Second Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10 (Friday, 3 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes (Friday, 3 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes (Thursday, 2 February)
- Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt (Wednesday, 1 February)
- ORIGIN - suggested changes (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10 (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt (Tuesday, 31 January)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt (Tuesday, 31 January)
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7233 (4664) (Friday, 20 January)
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4838) (Friday, 20 January)
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4663) (Friday, 20 January)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7234 (4616) (Friday, 20 January)
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7233 (4682) (Friday, 20 January)
- Re: Issue 271 of 5987bis - Proposed Standard or Internet Standard? (Monday, 16 January)
Martin J. Dürst
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Wednesday, 8 March)
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Wednesday, 8 March)
- Re: Issue 271 of 5987bis - Proposed Standard or Internet Standard? (Monday, 16 January)
- Re: Issue 271 of 5987bis - Proposed Standard or Internet Standard? (Monday, 16 January)
- Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range (Wednesday, 4 January)
Martin Thomson
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-08, Relaxing UTF-8 requirement for `keyid` (Saturday, 25 March)
- Re: Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10: (with COMMENT) (Thursday, 16 March)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-08, "6.1. Normative References" (Wednesday, 15 March)
- Re: HTTPBis Agenda for Chicago IETF 98 (Tuesday, 14 March)
- Comments on draft-montenegro-httpbis-h2ot-profile-00 (Tuesday, 14 March)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-08, "6.1. Normative References" (Monday, 13 March)
- Re: HTTP/QUIC Diverging from HTTP/2 (Friday, 10 March)
- Re: Secdir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10 (Thursday, 2 March)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-07, "2. The “aes128gcm” HTTP Content Coding" (Monday, 20 February)
- Re: H2: Should there be a limit to tolerance ? (Saturday, 18 February)
- Re: H2: Should there be a limit to tolerance ? (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-07.txt (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: aes128gcm: is the 1st example wrong? (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: aes128gcm: is the 1st example wrong? (Sunday, 12 February)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4925) (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: Proposed text for erratum on PRIORITY in RFC 7540 (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10 (Monday, 6 February)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10: 2.3. The "http-opportunistic" well-known URI / cache-control (Saturday, 4 February)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10: Example 2.1. Alternative Server Opt-In (Friday, 3 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes (Wednesday, 1 February)
- draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10 (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: Change to padding in encryption -- examples look ok (Tuesday, 31 January)
- Re: Change to padding in encryption -- enabling random access (Monday, 30 January)
- Re: Change to padding in encryption -- enabling random access (Monday, 30 January)
- Change to padding in encryption (Monday, 30 January)
- Re: aes128gcm: why verify padding? (Monday, 30 January)
- Re: aes128gcm: why verify padding? (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: aes128gcm: why verify padding? (Monday, 23 January)
- Re: aes128gcm: vulnerable to truncation attacks (Monday, 23 January)
- Re: Proposed text for erratum on PRIORITY in RFC 7540 (Monday, 23 January)
- Re: Shared Dictionaries (SDCH and friends) (Friday, 20 January)
- Proposed text for erratum on PRIORITY in RFC 7540 (Friday, 20 January)
- Re: Multiple Alt-Svc parameters of the same type (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames (Tuesday, 17 January)
- Re: aes128gcm: is the 1st example wrong? (Tuesday, 17 January)
- Re: Multiple Alt-Svc parameters of the same type (Tuesday, 17 January)
- Re: Multiple Alt-Svc parameters of the same type (Monday, 16 January)
- Re: Multiple Alt-Svc parameters of the same type (Monday, 16 January)
- Re: aes128gcm: why verify padding? (Monday, 16 January)
- Re: aes128gcm: why verify padding? (Monday, 16 January)
- Re: Issue 271 of 5987bis - Proposed Standard or Internet Standard? (Friday, 13 January)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption (was wrong draft) | Re: (rephrasing, sorry for duplicate) | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding (Wednesday, 11 January)
- Re: (rephrasing, sorry for duplicate) | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding (Tuesday, 10 January)
- Re: (rephrasing, sorry for duplicate) | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding (Tuesday, 3 January)
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding (Tuesday, 3 January)
- Very large values (Re: Call For Adoption Live Byte Ranges) (Tuesday, 3 January)
- Re: (rephrasing, sorry for duplicate) | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding (Monday, 2 January)
matt
Matt Menke
Matthew Kerwin
Michael Douglass
Michael Sweet
Michael Thornburgh
mike
Mike Bishop
- RE: Position of HPACK Dynamic Table Size Update (Wednesday, 29 March)
- RE: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis (Monday, 13 March)
- RE: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis (Monday, 13 March)
- RE: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis (Saturday, 11 March)
- RE: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis (Saturday, 11 March)
- RE: HTTP/QUIC Diverging from HTTP/2 (Friday, 10 March)
- RE: HTTP/QUIC Diverging from HTTP/2 (Friday, 10 March)
- RE: HTTP/QUIC Diverging from HTTP/2 (Thursday, 9 March)
- HTTP/QUIC Diverging from HTTP/2 (Thursday, 9 March)
- RE: forward HTTPS proxy | Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Wednesday, 1 March)
- RE: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Wednesday, 15 February)
- RE: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? (Tuesday, 14 February)
- RE: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt (Saturday, 11 February)
- RE: ORIGIN - suggested changes (Thursday, 2 February)
- RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10 (Wednesday, 1 February)
- RE: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt (Wednesday, 1 February)
- RE: Multiple Alt-Svc parameters of the same type (Monday, 16 January)
Nick Doty
Nick Sullivan
nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Monday, 20 March)
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Saturday, 18 March)
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Wednesday, 8 March)
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Wednesday, 8 March)
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Tuesday, 7 March)
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Tuesday, 7 March)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Friday, 17 February)
Patrick McManus
- Re: Alt-Svc special value "clear" clarification (Wednesday, 29 March)
- Re: Alt-Svc special value "clear" clarification (Wednesday, 29 March)
- Re: HTTPBis Agenda for Chicago IETF 98 (Wednesday, 15 March)
- HTTPBis Agenda for Chicago IETF 98 (Tuesday, 14 March)
- Re: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis (Tuesday, 14 March)
- Re: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis (Saturday, 11 March)
- Re: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis (Saturday, 11 March)
- on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis (Friday, 10 March)
- Re: DRAFT agenda for Chicago (Wednesday, 1 March)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: Call For Adoption Live Byte Ranges (Monday, 20 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: Second Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10 (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes (Sunday, 5 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes (Friday, 3 February)
- Re: Issue 271 of 5987bis - Proposed Standard or Internet Standard? (Tuesday, 31 January)
- Re: Proposed text for erratum on PRIORITY in RFC 7540 (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case? (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames (Thursday, 19 January)
- Issue 271 of 5987bis - Proposed Standard or Internet Standard? (Thursday, 12 January)
Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis (Saturday, 11 March)
- Re: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis (Saturday, 11 March)
- Re: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis (Friday, 10 March)
- Re: HTTP/QUIC Diverging from HTTP/2 (Friday, 10 March)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Wednesday, 1 March)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: H2: Should there be a limit to tolerance ? (Saturday, 18 February)
- Re: H2: Should there be a limit to tolerance ? (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: H2: Should there be a limit to tolerance ? (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: H2: Should there be a limit to tolerance ? (Friday, 17 February)
- H2: Should there be a limit to tolerance ? (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? (Tuesday, 14 February)
- back on draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00 (Wednesday, 1 February)
RFC Errata System
- [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7232 (4957) (Monday, 6 March)
- [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7540 (4925) (Thursday, 23 February)
- [Errata Rejected] RFC7233 (4665) (Thursday, 23 February)
- [Errata Verified] RFC7233 (4664) (Thursday, 23 February)
- [Errata Rejected] RFC7540 (4663) (Thursday, 23 February)
- [Errata Rejected] RFC7234 (4616) (Thursday, 23 February)
- [Errata Rejected] RFC7233 (4682) (Thursday, 23 February)
- [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7230 (4891) (Thursday, 23 February)
- [Errata Rejected] RFC7540 (4871) (Thursday, 23 February)
- [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7540 (4666) (Thursday, 23 February)
- [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7231 (4689) (Thursday, 23 February)
- [Errata Rejected] RFC7230 (4838) (Thursday, 16 February)
- [Errata Verified] RFC7230 (4839) (Thursday, 16 February)
- [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4925) (Tuesday, 7 February)
- [Errata Rejected] RFC7231 (4734) (Wednesday, 25 January)
Roland Zink
Roy T. Fielding
Ryan Hamilton
Samuel Hurst
Scott Mitchell
- Re: Proposed text for erratum on PRIORITY in RFC 7540 (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames (Friday, 20 January)
- Re: Proposed text for erratum on PRIORITY in RFC 7540 (Friday, 20 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames (Friday, 20 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames (Thursday, 19 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames (Wednesday, 18 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames (Wednesday, 18 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames (Tuesday, 17 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames (Tuesday, 17 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames (Tuesday, 17 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames (Tuesday, 17 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames (Tuesday, 17 January)
- Stream State and PRIORITY Frames (Tuesday, 17 January)
Stefan Eissing
- Re: 103 (Early Hints) vs. response headers (Thursday, 30 March)
- Re: 103 (Early Hints) vs. response headers (Thursday, 16 March)
- Re: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis (Tuesday, 14 March)
- Re: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis (Saturday, 11 March)
- Re: H2: Should there be a limit to tolerance ? (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: H2: Should there be a limit to tolerance ? (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes (Monday, 6 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes (Friday, 3 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: ORIGIN - suggested changes (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case? (Wednesday, 25 January)
- Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case? (Tuesday, 24 January)
Stephen Farrell
Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa
The IESG
Tom Bergan
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: Why should caches and intermediaries ignore If-Match? (Saturday, 4 March)
- Re: Why should caches and intermediaries ignore If-Match? (Friday, 3 March)
- Re: Why should caches and intermediaries ignore If-Match? (Thursday, 2 March)
- Re: Why should caches and intermediaries ignore If-Match? (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: Why should caches and intermediaries ignore If-Match? (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Thursday, 16 February)
- Why should caches and intermediaries ignore If-Match? (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt (Saturday, 4 February)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case? (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case? (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Is a faithful HTTP/2 response scheduler necessarily O(n) in the worst case? (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames (Friday, 20 January)
- Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames (Wednesday, 18 January)
Vasiliy Faronov
Vlad Krasnov
Walter H.
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Sunday, 19 March)
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Sunday, 19 March)
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Sunday, 19 March)
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Sunday, 19 March)
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Sunday, 19 March)
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Sunday, 19 March)
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Saturday, 18 March)
Wenbo Zhu
Werner Baumann
Wesley Oliver
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Tuesday, 7 March)
- Re: 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Tuesday, 7 March)
- 2017-03-06- UTC, TImeZone, DayLight Saving Shifts, Enconding (Monday, 6 March)
Willy Tarreau
- Re: 103 (Early Hints) vs. response headers (Thursday, 16 March)
- Re: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis (Wednesday, 15 March)
- Re: 103 (Early Hints) vs. response headers (Wednesday, 15 March)
- Re: on HTTP/QUIC and HTTPBis (Friday, 10 March)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: Appropriate use of HTTP status codes for application health checks (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: Appropriate use of HTTP status codes for application health checks (Thursday, 23 February)
- Re: The future of forward proxy servers in an http/2 over TLS world (Friday, 17 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length? (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt (Saturday, 11 February)
- Re: T-E chunked trailers (Friday, 10 February)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt (Thursday, 2 February)
Yi, EungJun
山本和彦
蕭雋涵
Last message date: Thursday, 30 March 2017 12:29:02 UTC