Re: Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3 allow bogus Content-Length?

--------
In message <D956A24E-4533-4EF4-B74F-377063768C48@redhat.com>, "Jason T. Greene" writes:
>On Feb 14, 2017, at 3:15 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
>> 
>> Last year, I think, I have had some dude claim that a "valid value"
>> was a sequence of digits, but that there is no explicit requirement
>> that it match the length of the body of that request.
>> 
>> I told him to get stuffed.
>
>Out of morbid curiosity, what semantics did he expect?

I think it was "It should just work" ?

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

Received on Tuesday, 14 February 2017 21:57:43 UTC