- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 10:13:13 +1100
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: Wesley Oliver <wesley.olis@gmail.com>, Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>, Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>, Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>, mthornbu@adobe.com
That sounds like a good plan; discussing it on this mailing list isn't going to involve the right people, and it's not particularly topical here. Cheers, > On 8 Mar 2017, at 7:20 am, Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU> wrote: > > Hi, all, > > FYI - this was all discussed on the IETF main list, starting with a post > on Dec 31, 2016: > > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/To8dZTn9uBJLnzqIvEDPpNnA1rc > > We went down all these roads before (including TAI, UTC, and local time). > > The real problem, as noted by Michael, is that Unix time is "none of the > above" and has no simple conversion to the above. > > And that the IETF doesn't govern the definition of Unix time. > > However, I'm pulling together a draft on the this issue in order to > cache this information for future users. > > Those interested in collaborating are encouraged to contact me off-list > directly. I'll try to pull in some folks from the Dec/Jan IETF > discussion as well. > > Joe > > > > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 7 March 2017 23:13:49 UTC