- From: Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 09:06:20 +0000
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Cc: Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com>, Scott Mitchell <scott.k.mitch1@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
> On 17 Jan 2017, at 22:27, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think that we probably want to clarify the point by explicitly > saying that PRIORITY doesn't affect stream states. We say that it can > be sent in any state, but we don't also mention that important point. > Do people here agree that an erratum on this point is appropriate > here? Yeah. The community has managed to coalesce around the “right” answer, I think, but it would help to have it stated more explicitly in the specification. Cory
Received on Wednesday, 18 January 2017 09:06:57 UTC