Re: Stream State and PRIORITY Frames

> On 17 Jan 2017, at 22:27, Martin Thomson <> wrote:
> I think that we probably want to clarify the point by explicitly
> saying that PRIORITY doesn't affect stream states.  We say that it can
> be sent in any state, but we don't also mention that important point.
> Do people here agree that an erratum on this point is appropriate
> here?

Yeah. The community has managed to coalesce around the “right” answer, I think, but it would help to have it stated more explicitly in the specification.


Received on Wednesday, 18 January 2017 09:06:57 UTC