- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 12:25:01 +1100
- To: "Walter H." <walter.h@mathemainzel.info>, Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>, Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>, werner.baumann@onlinehome.de, msweet@apple.com
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
[WG chair hat on] Folks please take this off-list; it's not on topic here. Thanks, > On 20 Mar 2017, at 5:22 am, Walter H. <walter.h@mathemainzel.info> wrote: > > On 19.03.2017 19:10, Joe Touch wrote: >> >>> when the client allows to define, only to show events going on the actual day or later, such events are shown, too ... >>> >>> by the way, the RFC5545 is bullshit, because nobody interprets the following >>> "working days from monday to friday" >>> like this ... >> I cannot find that sort of indication (Monday to Friday) in that RFC. > Gratulation: you have just given the prove that this RFC is really bullshit, because > an event is possible to go from monday to friday ... > > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 20 March 2017 01:25:42 UTC