- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 07:46:46 +0100
- To: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2017-01-16 04:33, Martin J. Dürst wrote: > On 2017/01/16 10:29, Mark Nottingham wrote: >> Personal hat - >> >> I'd prefer Proposed Standard; I don't think we want to overly promote >> the use of this encoding in new header fields, so calling it an >> Internet Standard sends the wrong message. > > Fully agreed! > > Also, Julian mentioned that it might be additional work to move it to > full Standard, but if this is ever necessary, it can happen as part of No, I didn't (as far as I remember). > moving HTTP 1.1 to full standard, with very little overhead. That's an interesting proposal; however, I'd be very surprised if those who don't want it to be full standard would support integration into the next set of base specs. Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 16 January 2017 06:47:38 UTC