Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-08, "6.1. Normative References" from Martin Thomson on 2017-03-15 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from January to March 2017)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 06:53:09 +1100
To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnU_P77EJ6nRNXv9ijeRzzQN7F_YKZcrCAx4mZkFLgH9Dg@mail.gmail.com>

On 15 March 2017 at 23:43, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote:
> If that is the only reason, why not use *actual* base64url as defined in
> RFC 4648?

The reason to use 7515 is that 4648 doesn't use that name, but
otherwise I'm ambivalent.

Received on Wednesday, 15 March 2017 19:53:47 UTC