- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 20:47:19 +0100
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "Manger, James" <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com>
- Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2017-01-17 04:16, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 17 January 2017 at 15:26, Manger, James > <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com> wrote: >> IKM = B33e_VeFrOyIHwFTIfmesA >> salt = sJvlboCWzB5jr8hI_q9cOQ >> >> Draft gives: >> PRK = MLAQxt_DHjM15cdlyU1oUnjq7TFlzToGTkdRmvvxVBw >> >> But I get: >> PRK = Mg9ErPx3DpJfkz72kj7Yvx369iqvd4Fmf7tOMTdXELo > > Ahh, so do I. Strange. I ran those examples many times. And I even > have unit tests against them.... > > ...except that the unit test has the key "6Aqf1aDH8lSxLyCpoCnAqg", > which I expect will work for you. Fixed it in 622f21d. FWIW, I was able to reproduce the examples with the updated code in <https://gist.github.com/reschke/46659c912b426dffeac41d9a21421c95>, modulo the change Martin mentioned (but which I don't see in Git). WRT <https://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-06.html#rfc.section.3.2>: it would be good if the prose mentioned that this specifies a keyid of "a1" in the header. Best regards, Julian
Received on Sunday, 12 February 2017 19:48:42 UTC