Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10: 2.3. The "http-opportunistic" well-known URI / cache-control from Martin Thomson on 2017-02-04 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from January to March 2017)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2017 10:57:28 +1100
To: Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
Cc: HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVSWuCK2=Jg1i5mamiFa3_9RYfU6QgFWhb5tDUyE0Ku2g@mail.gmail.com>

On 4 February 2017 at 20:46, Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org> wrote:
> In other words is client allowed use http-opportunistic response
> from another alternative service for that purpose, when response
> was cache-control = no-store ?

I'd say no.  The same goes for no-cache I think.

> I think that it is not possible to use response from another
> alternative service on that case and therefore cache-control = no-store
> implies that client must retrieve /.well-known/http-opportunistic
> from chosen alternative service.

That sounds right.

Received on Saturday, 4 February 2017 23:58:31 UTC