- From: 山本和彦 <kazu@iij.ad.jp>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 13:03:58 +0900 (JST)
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Hi Tom, > Why is that a misuse of priority? It seems entirely reasonable for a client > to specify a mostly-linear order. There is a very good reason for this: > inside HTML pages, CSS links and synchronous scripts must be evaluated in > the order they appear in the HTML file. This implies that the server should > send those resources in a linear order. This is exactly the rationale > behind Chrome using mostly-linear orders. (This is not to say that > mostly-linear orders are not occasionally problematic -- they are > <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=651538#c1> -- but > there are good reasons to linear orders at least some of the time.) Thank you for your explanation. I did not know this use case. So, I would like to withdraw my previous word "misuse". --Kazu
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2017 04:04:51 UTC