- From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 23:05:12 +0100 (CET)
- To: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
- cc: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, 15 Feb 2017, Matthew Kerwin wrote: > That, along with everything else in 3.3.2 & 3.3.3, and 3.4 makes me wonder > how anyone could find ambiguity there. If C-L is present, it has to be > correct. ... but we still see a significant amount of content on the web today that serve bodies with sizes that aren't matching the C-L value. I went several rounds against that, trying to make Firefox's C-L checks stricter, but finally lost in the end and had to resort to keeping funky heuristics and guessworks. The web is a harsh place! =) -- / daniel.haxx.se
Received on Tuesday, 14 February 2017 22:06:37 UTC