- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 09:49:00 +1100
- To: Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
- Cc: HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 7 February 2017 at 05:35, Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org> wrote: > This may also imply that, if server does not allow caching > http-opportunistic resource, client need acquiring the > http-opportunistic resource from chosen alternative service > before using it. If server does that kind conclusion, this > looks still ok. ( That was my question about cache-control > = no-store. ) Yep. That's a natural consequence of the requirements we have in place.
Received on Monday, 6 February 2017 22:49:32 UTC