- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 11:52:45 +1100
- To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, d.stussy@yahoo.com
REJECT. As discussed, this isn't an issue for the HTTP specification. > On 13 Apr 2016, at 4:10 am, d.stussy@yahoo.com wrote: > > It breaks the CGI interface, which per RFC 3875 is expecting the SERVER_PROTOCOL variable to contain "HTTP/2.0", not "HTTP/2". It may also break any server log analysis tools which depend on the ANBF syntax as the variable may also appear in the logs. > > RFC 3875, Section 4.1.16 ABNF: > > HTTP-Version = "HTTP" "/" 1*digit "." 1*digit > > The "minor" number is not optional. If this has been changed, RFC 7540 needs to say so. It doesn't. > > Personally, I don't care if this is handled via an errata or another RFC which clarifies the conflict. > > -------------------------------------------- > On Tue, 4/12/16, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote: > I don't understand how it breaks anything: when you use HTTP/1.1, you have the minor version. When you use HTTP/2, you're using a server that understands HTTP/2 and knows what to expect. Please explain where the problem occurs. > ... > > > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 20 January 2017 00:53:38 UTC