- From: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 14:22:24 +0100
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "Nygren, Erik" <nygren@akamai.com>
Looks good to me. *But* I think I would be good to have an ORIGIN frame that says: please revert your ORIGIN set back to undefined for this connection (and erase all 421 derived information). This should be less complex than individual removes and provide for changes on very long lived connections. -Stefan > Am 03.02.2017 um 01:43 schrieb Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>: > > I've done some more updating: > https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/285 > > At this point, the diff isn't too helpful, so see attached. > > Changes include: > > 1. Removing set manipulation flags > 2. Reserving some flags for future backwards-incompatible extensions (which makes me feel a bit better about #1) > 3. Note impact upon Server Push > 4. Added IANA Considerations and Operational Considerations > 5. Lots of clarifications > > Feedback welcome, as always. > > > <draft-ietf-httpbis-origin-frame.html> > > >> On 2 Feb 2017, at 12:30 pm, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: >> >> >>> On 2 Feb 2017, at 12:23 pm, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 2 February 2017 at 10:12, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: >>>> I don't buy the argument that removal itself adds complexity. Implementations already need to remember what origins they received a 421 for, so they already have the concept of origin set removal. >>> >>> Well, you just established why it might be unnecessary. The gain here >>> is in the client not sending a request to the wrong place. But if >>> this is rare enough, then that cost is probably bearable. >> >> Right, but the whole point of ORIGIN is to avoid those situations. >> >> >>> The "everything except those" case doesn't concern me that much. >>> Iknow it's relatively common, but it is fairly rare that the set of >>> origins that are used is not easily enumerable, or incrementally >>> discoverable. >> >> Spoken like a true browser vendor :) >> >> It'd be good to get a bit more data here from server-side folks. Anyone share this concern? I note that Nick seems to be OK with it. >> >> Cheers, >> >> -- >> Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ >> >> > > -- > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > Stefan Eissing <green/>bytes GmbH Hafenstrasse 16 48155 Münster www.greenbytes.de
Received on Friday, 3 February 2017 13:23:02 UTC