Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10

I know we're pretty exhausted with this one, but I do observe that the change since WGLC on this one are pretty substantial:

However, Mike is Document Shepherd on this one, so I'll let him make the call as to whether we need another WGLC. Personally, I think if we do have one, a week or so would be sufficient.


> On 1 Feb 2017, at 4:17 pm, Martin Thomson <> wrote:
> I've just posted an update to this doc:
> This incorporates my best attempt to address the comments Kari had on
> the last version.  If this is OK, I think that Mark should ask the
> IESG to publish this as Experimental.

Mark Nottingham

Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2017 06:08:32 UTC