- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 11:53:35 +1100
- To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
- Cc: "A. Rothman" <amichai2@amichais.net>, HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
VERIFIED. > On 13 Apr 2016, at 7:40 pm, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > > > On 2016-04-13 10:41, RFC Errata System wrote: >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7233, >> "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Range Requests". >> >> -------------------------------------- >> You may review the report below and at: >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7233&eid=4664 >> >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Technical >> Reported by: Amichai Rothman <amichai2@amichais.net> >> >> Section: 4.4 >> >> Original Text >> ------------- >> The 416 (Range Not Satisfiable) status code indicates that none of >> the ranges in the request's Range header field (Section 3.1) overlap >> the current extent of the selected resource or that the set of ranges >> requested has been rejected due to invalid ranges or an excessive >> request of small or overlapping ranges. >> >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> The 416 (Range Not Satisfiable) status code indicates that none of >> the ranges in the request's Range header field (Section 3.1) overlap >> the current extent of the selected representation or that the set of >> ranges requested has been rejected due to invalid ranges or an excessive >> request of small or overlapping ranges. >> ... > > I agree that "representation" would have been the correct term here. > > Best regards, Julian -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 20 January 2017 00:54:05 UTC