Re: Issue 271 of 5987bis - Proposed Standard or Internet Standard?

• From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
• Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 14:18:30 +1300
• To: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
• Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <CABkgnnVw9K4DiRySgSjbYcxkEyAqxU9DU3dw4e4+vpEk6ff5Zg@mail.gmail.com>

On 13 January 2017 at 11:10, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com> wrote:
> I need to direct your attention to one of just two open issues with the
> 5987bis document (Indicating Character Encoding and Language for HTTP Header
> Field Parameters), which deals with the intended status of the eventual RFC.

Proposed Standard would seem to be sufficient.  I would think that
being MORE mature than HTTP would be unrealistic, so that limits us to
PS.

Received on Friday, 13 January 2017 01:19:02 UTC