- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 16:47:52 +1100
- To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
- Cc: Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>, "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, karl+rfc@la-grange.net, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Should be REJECTED. This is a bug in the tools that convert the RFC to HTML, not the RFC itself. Cheers, > On 6 Mar 2017, at 4:43 pm, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7232, > "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Conditional Requests". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7232&eid=4957 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Karl Dubost <karl+rfc@la-grange.net> > > Section: 2.3.3 > > Original Text > ------------- > Consider a resource that is subject to content negotiation (Section > 3.4 of [RFC7231]), and where the representations sent in response to > a GET request vary based on the Accept-Encoding request header field > (Section 5.3.4 of [RFC7231]): > > Corrected Text > -------------- > Consider a resource that is subject to content negotiation (Section > 3.4 of [RFC7231]), and where the representations sent in response to > a GET request vary based on the Accept-Encoding request header field > (Section 5.3.4 of [RFC7231]): > > Notes > ----- > Twice the string "./rfc7231" in the links "Section 3.4" > before the hash sign is missing to link to the correct > content negotiation section. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC7232 (draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-26) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Conditional Requests > Publication Date : June 2014 > Author(s) : R. Fielding, Ed., J. Reschke, Ed. > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis APP > Area : Applications > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 6 March 2017 05:48:55 UTC