Re: Proposed text for erratum on PRIORITY in RFC 7540

> On 20 Jan 2017, at 03:59, Martin Thomson <> wrote:
> I think that we only really need one piece of clarification (the
> second would be enough), but it doesn't hurt to make it clear in both
> places that one might go to learn this.

Agreed. I’m happy with both proposed texts.

Received on Friday, 20 January 2017 13:39:06 UTC