Re: Proposed text for erratum on PRIORITY in RFC 7540 from Cory Benfield on 2017-01-20 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from January to March 2017)

From: Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 13:38:30 +0000
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <B92DD569-DB7D-4952-B745-F5D91C3F6B02@lukasa.co.uk>

> On 20 Jan 2017, at 03:59, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I think that we only really need one piece of clarification (the
> second would be enough), but it doesn't hurt to make it clear in both
> places that one might go to learn this.

Agreed. I’m happy with both proposed texts.

Received on Friday, 20 January 2017 13:39:06 UTC