- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 06:24:36 +0000
- To: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
- cc: "quic@ietf.org" <quic@ietf.org>, HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
-------- In message <BN6PR03MB2708BEF0008BD24BF8387C6487200@BN6PR03MB2708.namprd03.prod. outlook.com>, Mike Bishop writes: >but there appears to be general support for considering these separate >protocols which are closely related, rather than two variants of a >single protocol. If so, it would be incredibly short-sighted to not take the chance to drop some of the worst bogons overboard while you have the chance. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Friday, 10 March 2017 06:25:06 UTC