Re: Change to padding in encryption -- enabling random access

On 30 January 2017 at 17:04, Manger, James
<> wrote:
> Padding is in-band even when the encryptor doesn't want to use any, so an in-band signal that there is no earlier padding doesn't feel like complexity that is out-of-place.

That would be true if you consider the random access use case to be
common enough to justify any complexity at all.

Received on Monday, 30 January 2017 06:28:01 UTC