- From: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 17:32:15 -0500
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOdDvNpHD=Lh_RYOzUEA3kigjof0X+mJiL_q0YMwMh__noqKVw@mail.gmail.com>
LGTM; I'm prepared to update the firefox implementation to match. On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 8:19 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > Sending with a new Subject to make sure people see it. > > Let's say it'll last until at least 9 Feb. > > Cheers, > > > On 2 Feb 2017, at 6:28 am, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com> > wrote: > > > > I would agree that the changes are pretty substantial, both in text and > spirit. A short second WGLC seems like a good idea. Everyone give it a > fresh read (I'll do likewise) and post any feedback to the list. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mark Nottingham [mailto:mnot@mnot.net] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 10:08 PM > > To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> > > Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Mike Bishop < > Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com> > > Subject: Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10 > > > > I know we're pretty exhausted with this one, but I do observe that the > change since WGLC on this one are pretty substantial: > > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-httpbis-http2- > encryption-04&url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10 > > > > However, Mike is Document Shepherd on this one, so I'll let him make the > call as to whether we need another WGLC. Personally, I think if we do have > one, a week or so would be sufficient. > > > > Cheers, > > > > > >> On 1 Feb 2017, at 4:17 pm, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> I've just posted an update to this doc: > >> > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption/ > >> > >> This incorporates my best attempt to address the comments Kari had on > >> the last version. If this is OK, I think that Mark should ask the > >> IESG to publish this as Experimental. > >> > > > -- > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > > >
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2017 22:32:52 UTC