- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 19:52:16 +0000
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- cc: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
-------- In message <CABkgnnUObhgeJZOmP4cZMGG1zQt93kXRFOA2NuOVERT2mtDLxw@mail.gmail.com>, Martin Thomson writes: >On 18 February 2017 at 10:01, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: >> What I'm asking is if we should try to avoid have N different >> critieria for N different implementations or if it makes sense >> to try to coordinate some sort of same-ish criteria. > >I'd caution that releasing actual numbers tends to create an exposure, >once someone knows what the limit truly is, they know the limits of >the abuse they can perform. Ohh, absolutely, they should be configurable. I was thinking more in terms of the criteria rather than the precise limits. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Saturday, 18 February 2017 19:52:50 UTC